Episode 341

341. There's a grape under your back

A Pilates cue goes off the rails and exposes everything we get wrong about “perfect form.” Expect heresy, biomechanics, and a very small grape that ruins neutral forever.



This podcast uses the following third-party services for analysis:

AdBarker - https://adbarker.com/privacy
Transcript
::

You're lying on a reformer carriage. Two red springs.

::

Your headrest is all the way down. Arms are in straps. Fingers point to the ceiling.

::

You're in a perfect neutral spine. There is one small to medium-sized grape

::

under the small of your back. You're pressing it with extreme gentleness into the carriage.

::

Your legs, perfect tabletop.

::

Precisely 90 degrees at the hip, 90 degrees at the knee, ankles, plantar flexed.

::

Inhale to prepare.

::

Gently engage the pelvic floor. Draw the hip bones together.

::

Exhale through pursed lips. Start by slightly flexing your cranium on your C1 and C2.

::

Engaging the deep neck flexors, leaving the sternocleidomastoids relaxed.

::

As you continue to exhale through pursed lips,

::

Press your hands into the straps Keeping the shoulders wide,

::

collarbones long Gently draw the straps down towards the carriage Congratulations,

::

you are now doing mid-back series Heathlander.

::

I'm just shivering in my little PTSD corner over there. Did I traumatize you too badly?

::

Properly triggered. There should have been a trigger warning on that intro, dude.

::

Fuck me. Did I forget any muscles?

::

There was probably about another, what, 214 muscles you didn't mention?

::

You've got the big ones, the important ones. I could have said something like,

::

use your core to pull the straps down.

::

Oh, yeah, yeah. It needs to come from your powerhouse, your core, yeah, yeah.

::

So sorry, I could try that again from the core this time. Yeah,

::

yeah, yeah. You wouldn't pass your test out on that one, dude.

::

Yeah, so what was wrong with that picture that I just so carefully painted for you?

::

Ah. Well, Joseph's turning in his grave to start, right?

::

Like, mid-back is... Did he stabilise his core before he turned?

::

Yeah, that's right. Yeah.

::

Well, I mean, I think you're putting that on the table because...

::

If you're a group reformer teacher, you teach that movement.

::

You don't go very far or very long without being supine hands in straps,

::

pressing the straps towards the bed or the foot bar and doing some variation

::

of that movement. It's not a bad exercise.

::

It's not a bad exercise, if you cue it properly. Yeah, I use it all the time.

::

Let's be clear. What I mean is it's like if you're a group reformer teacher,

::

you're going to teach that just like you're going to teach long stretch and

::

you're going to teach lunges.

::

Like this is going to be part of your repertoire day in, day out.

::

It's one of the exercises on the reformer where you don't run out of resistance

::

very quickly as you get stronger.

::

Right. And depending what you do with the resistance, you can take it to some

::

pretty interesting places, but not if you do it in neutral.

::

All okay so we're we're not doing it in neutral i mean obviously still in tabletop though no.

::

Um i said when i was at a class at a studio that shall remain nameless and i

::

was waiting for the class to start and.

::

I was warming myself up by lying in a supine tuck position. So I had my knees

::

pulled to my chest and was pulling them apart and pulling them together.

::

My knees, because I can, and it doesn't mean everyone should,

::

but I can, when knees were properly at my armpits and that's where they warm up to.

::

And the instructor came over and adjusted the, while I was in that position,

::

which felt a little bit personal, so I released the position.

::

She she adjusted the uh the stopper and the foot bar so that to ensure that

::

my knee didn't come closer to me than my hip and then said okay now we've got

::

the foot bar in the right place,

::

you know that's where you'll do your work from and i said sorry what why are

::

we setting it up there and she said i was just so that we don't go into too

::

deep an angle of hip flexion i was like you walked up to me and i was like kissing

::

my own kneecap and now you're anyway so all that to say,

::

no, I don't teach tabletop and I don't advocate it and I think it's a total

::

waste of time trying to teach people it.

::

You should teach them a tuck position where you're in full flexion and it's

::

a shape that actually scales into other movements.

::

Well, I must be better at Pilates than you because I couldn't get my knees to

::

my armpits unless I chopped my legs off.

::

That's because I haven't got quads like this. I'm trying, still trying.

::

20 years in, I'm still trying. Well, 20 years in, I'm still working on my splits.

::

And you know how well I'm doing in inverted commas. I really will.

::

Yeah. All right. So there's a lot to unpack in there.

::

And so I think that really in a little bit of seriousness, there is a serious topic here.

::

And so I guess in seriousness, what we're talking about today is really restrictive

::

movement cues that really prevent people from actually getting the actual benefit from the movement.

::

We're not only using useless cues that are just wasting time and effort and,

::

you know, filling up the airspace, we're actually actively doing.

::

Just decreasing the value people get from the movement by using just nonsensical ass-backwards cues.

::

Now, dear listener, if you are using nonsensical ass-backwards cues,

::

no disrespect, that was me for fucking years.

::

Years, I did it. That's how come I can still do it after not doing it for a

::

decade, because I'd said it so many thousands of times.

::

The tape recording is still in my brain. I just press the button and out it comes.

::

And so, Heath, I know you you did that also for years

::

so no shade you know we look

::

at the most the the the log in our own eye

::

here as well so you

::

know um you know now we're in a safe space uh you know what is what you know

::

why why tuck you know let's break it down so there's there's the there's the

::

there's so many things about the way that i cued that that exercise at the start

::

of the show that both you and I have a problem with.

::

One is the use of the tabletop position instead of tuck.

::

The other one is neutral spine instead of just pressing your freaking back hard into the mat.

::

Third one is just the over-queuing of muscles.

::

There's probably more there. And then the other one is where you,

::

when the straps go below the level of the shoulder, the question is what muscles are we working on?

::

So then it's like, okay, is it mid-back or is it abs? And then,

::

you know, I think that there's actually an interesting conversation.

::

All right. So let's start with that. Let's start with that.

::

So the thing is, and you and I haven't talked about this explicitly,

::

but I think at this point I'd know exactly what you're thinking here.

::

So correct me if I'm wrong. Okay.

::

As your arms are lying on your back, your head's on the carriage,

::

your head's on the headrest, your arms are vertical, your hands are in the straps.

::

If there's a couple of springs on, the straps are pulling your arms into shoulder flexion.

::

They're pulling your arms back past your head. You're working with your shoulder

::

girdle muscles, your lats, your pecs, etc., etc., to extend your arms.

::

So the shoulder extensors are working, right?

::

And so as you pull down and down and down, at some point when your arms are

::

parallel with the straps, right, the straps, the ropes are running right along your arms, right?

::

So as your arms are vertical, the straps run back away from your arms.

::

But as you bring your arms down and down and down, at some point,

::

your arms and the straps are touching, okay? And at that point,

::

the straps are no longer pulling you into flexion.

::

They're also not pulling you into extension. They're pulling you to shoulder elevation.

::

Right? They're actually just elevating your shoulder. They're pulling along the axis of your arm.

::

Now, as you continue downwards from that point, the straps are actually now

::

pulling you into shoulder flexion.

::

Right? So you, into extension, my apologies.

::

And so now you have to actually work your flexors a little bit.

::

Now, it's not a lot of work.

::

Right? But now you're working your deltoids, your front deltoids,

::

et cetera, in order to slightly flex the shoulders.

::

So actually, as the line of pull, the point is, dear listener,

::

as you move your arms through the arc from vertical to horizontal in the mid-back

::

series position, or the lying on your back, supine, arms and straps,

::

however you want to call it, as you move your arms down,

::

the line of pull changes such that.

::

The exercise, the resistance actually disappears.

::

You're no longer working your shoulder extensors. Like you just,

::

they're not working at all.

::

In fact, they're basically, you're working the opposite muscles by the bottom of the movement.

::

So as you go to put your hands on the carriage, number one, the carriage is

::

supporting the weight of your arms. So your flexors aren't working.

::

And number two, the straps are lifting you up and supporting the weight of your arms as well.

::

So your extensors are like nothing's working there, basically.

::

It's like almost in equilibrium state, like you're floating in a flotation tank or something.

::

So basically, when your arms go below the straps, it's all wasted effort,

::

all wasted time from there on.

::

There's no resistance, essentially. Is that what you were thinking, Heath?

::

Well, that would be what I was thinking before we lift the head and shoulders.

::

So if we're doing, like, say, a classical coordination where the head stays

::

down, and And if we say that's for, you know,

::

that Raf's just talked about the, you know, the paradox of what happens through

::

the arc of the movement at the shoulder.

::

And, you know, if you were taught about connecting into the shoulder girdle,

::

that moment where you feel the push into the straps rather than the pull,

::

blah, blah, blah, you know,

::

Raf's just described that you, you essentially, you're going into the moment

::

where your shoulder depressors become the major movement rather than the flexors extensors.

::

If you're taught as I was, and Raf you can correct me if I misunderstood the

::

teaching because you were my teacher,

::

if you were taught that this is a movement when you raise your head and shoulders

::

that's about the mid-back, now whether that's about using the,

::

this was one of the answers I was given, it might have been Raf that gave me the answer,

::

using the proprioception of the bed to get the scapula to move more correctly

::

on the ribcage because of that,

::

or that it's as you press into the bed, the muscles of your mid-back,

::

your mid-traps, rhomboids, et cetera, start to be engaged if you were taught that,

::

then that's one way to think about it.

::

And I would say to that, if you want to work the muscles of your mid-back,

::

go and do it in chest expansion or a movement like that, where they actually

::

move against load through range of motion.

::

But when I ask instructors in workshops...

::

What this movement's for, once they've been teaching for a while,

::

all of that stuff has evaporated. And they think that the answer is it's for your abs.

::

Like when, when I say, okay, when you give this movement to a group,

::

what do your clients experience and what is it?

::

What do you tick off with the movement? The answer is always abs, maybe hip flexors.

::

And in that context, then

::

what's interesting about this

::

movement the way I teach it now and advocate

::

it and how we teach it in our courses is when

::

you press the straps down they don't go below the level of your shoulder joint

::

head and shoulders curl up and the cue is try and touch the foot bar if the

::

foot bar's up so I leave my foot bar up I know that's heresy leave the foot

::

bar up press the straps down try and touch the foot bar don't let the straps

::

touch your wrists and curl up as high as possible.

::

And now the line of resistance from the rope is pulling your shoulders back

::

down. So your abdominals actually work against the line of pull.

::

If your hands go below your shoulder, then it's actually easier to sit up. Yes.

::

Right. So if you think this is for your abs and you cue hands to the bed,

::

you're putting your foot on the accelerator and the brake at the same time and the clutch.

::

So you've got fuck all, you've got exit, you've got nothing happening,

::

brakes, accelerator, clutch. You're just sitting there going,

::

I don't know, this is not happening.

::

So try it in your own body. I mean, actually, you know, if you want to sort

::

of extend that line of reasoning, if you, if you, as you curl up,

::

right, if you're curling up and you're actually thinking of this as mainly an

::

ab exercise, as opposed to mainly an arm exercise,

::

because let's face it, the abs are way stronger than, sorry,

::

the arms are way stronger than the abs for most people.

::

And so when you, even though you're working your arms a bit,

::

your abs are going to get tired way before your arms in this one.

::

So if you actually keep your arms vertical, it's actually harder,

::

you know, because you've got a longer lever there against the abs. So –,

::

But, you know, just leaving that aside for a second, you know,

::

going back to what you said about the mid-back, you know, the mid-traps,

::

the lower traps, blah, blah, blah, the rhomboids.

::

You know, I can't honestly remember teaching you this or, you know, that.

::

But, you know, and I think it's just a stock Pilates thing that those exercises

::

are called the mid-back series.

::

I think most other people call them like arms in straps or something like that.

::

And of course, there were specific exercises, like coordination,

::

100, and overhead, and blah, blah, blah.

::

But I'm just talking about lying on your back, pull the straps down,

::

pull them up, pull the straps down, lift them up, triceps extension,

::

straight arms, arm circles, blah, blah, blah.

::

One leg long, two legs long, all the rest of it.

::

Most people do think of it as an ab exercise, but I imagine a Pilates purist,

::

of which I was one way back in the day,

::

would say something along the lines of, it's not for strengthening meaning, you know, as such,

::

it's for control of the, you know, for activation and correct stability of the

::

scapulae to maintain your scapulae, you know,

::

stabilized on your back as you curl up and bring your arms down.

::

And so the challenge is more proprioceptive and stability rather than, you know,

::

strength and then we shouldn't add too much load on because then we'll spoil

::

we'll lose the benefit of the movement and it won't be about stability anymore

::

it'll just be about you know quote,

::

muscling through it with your quote global muscles and that's pretty much what i would have said,

::

a decade and a half ago so what do you say to that,

::

Oh, you're just hurting my feelings.

::

All right. So if we're talking about, and you mean, correct me where I missed

::

the biomechanical subtleties of this, but if we're talking about stability...

::

It's the property of a system to return to its resting state once it's been perturbed.

::

So you do stuff and it comes back. Stability in biomechanics is very, very poorly defined.

::

No one's come up with an agreed upon definition of what it actually is.

::

And generally what physios and Pilates instructors mean when they say stability

::

is keeping your body part still.

::

Now, sometimes we mean keeping your scapula flat on your spine and on your ribcage

::

and not winging or anteriorly tilting or whatever.

::

Yeah, but basically what they mean is nebulous and ill-defined and everyone

::

means a different thing by it and you can't really measure it.

::

But yeah, aside from that, pray continue. Yeah, well, often just,

::

I mean, so often what I think people have been taught, if only by inference,

::

what stability means is essentially dissociation.

::

Like you're demonstrating your ability to stabilize when you can keep one thing

::

in one place and do something with something else.

::

Hold body part A still, move body part B.

::

B, right. And teaching that adds a complexity to what could otherwise be a pretty

::

intuitive movement. So it affirms our expertise rather than empowering the core.

::

Oh, and a really cynical, a really cynical, a

::

much more cynical podcast host than me would say that that would be a great

::

way of making up some kind of dysfunction so that your clients feel bad about

::

their bodies and you're the only one with a secret answer that can cure their made-up dysfunction.

::

Right. And then if you scale that out, you've got a population of people who

::

think they're unsafe in movement, shit at Pilates, and if they don't do it right,

::

they're going to injure themselves so they don't train in a way that actually

::

gives them healthier, happier, longer lives as an outcome.

::

You'd have to be really fucking cynical to say that though, Nate.

::

I know, it's dark. We're in dark waters here. All right, so coming back to the

::

scapular stabilization thing.

::

So one way we seem to be taught what stabilization is, is dissociation.

::

And we can talk about dissociation in another session because there's lots of

::

movements that do that really well and that we can unpack.

::

Another one would be that your scapula are flat and flush on the rib cage.

::

And when you protract and slightly

::

upwardly rotate your scapula that's a damn good place

::

to put them flat and flush on the rib cage because your rib

::

cage folks is not a rectangle it's an oblong one of my favorite words in the

::

english language and so when you move the scapula in that way they they suck

::

on so if you're really interested in training scapula on the rib cage that hands

::

position where the hands are not to the bed is a great one and then paradoxically

::

as your hands come below the line of your shoulder,

::

the humeral head follows the glenoid, so the scapula is actually going to change

::

its position, and it won't be as stable,

::

except that it is stable because stability is its ability to manage force through,

::

like we probably need to do a full thing on, or you can do one on,

::

the glenoid follows the humeral head.

::

But what I wanted to say to what you said, Raf, is...

::

As you increase the load, and by that I mean as you add more springs and you

::

do the movement the way I sort of laid it out, where the hands don't go below

::

the line of the shoulder,

::

the heavier the load becomes, the more you can tolerate that load,

::

the easier it is to pull your knees to your chest and bring your hips up.

::

And you start to be able to get to the rib cage and to the shoulder blade,

::

and that starts to open up the movement that I learned with my hands pressing

::

into the bed as, now I've forgotten the name, overhead.

::

And now overhead pressing your hands into the bed is one thing.

::

I'm going to stick my hand up and say, I like to stick my hand into the bed when I do overhead.

::

Yeah, of course. Which is like jackknife, right? Overhead is jackknife on the reformer.

::

Overhead is jackknife, 100%. And so if you're working with someone who's working

::

on jackknife, overhead, or they've got quads like RAF, they're going to want

::

to press their hands into the bed because they've got to generate a lot of force.

::

Try lifting your legs up over your head when your legs weigh freaking 70 kilos. Right.

::

Like if Raph was in my class, I would call, hey, Raph, press your hands into

::

the bed until we get used to getting the hips off, right?

::

But I'd also look at Raph and think, well, he's got pecs that are commensurate

::

to his quads and biceps that are commensurate to his quads.

::

So I think if I can get him the skill, which is to manage the load,

::

then I reckon I can get him to his shoulders, but it would mean I have to put

::

a lot of load into the strap. I was just going to say, if you give me all the springs.

::

Yeah, well, that's what I would do. Like I, more and more, the further along

::

I go, the more often I teach full spring hands and straps towards overhead if

::

the clients can come with me.

::

And the paradox of it is once your arms, which as Raf said, are strong relative

::

to your abs can tolerate the load. And that's also getting used to it.

::

Then you can use that as a platform to roll your hips off the bed and it's an.

::

Unstable platform. Like you're not pressing into the bed, but it's actually very stable.

::

Like it's, once you get used to the load, it gives you a lot because as Raf

::

said, the higher your arm, the longer the lever, the more load there is.

::

So paradoxically, the skill of jackknife comes from heavy springs and that makes

::

your scapula connect to your rib cage more effectively because all the muscles work harder to do that.

::

I'm talking about paradoxical things. I think it's kind of paradoxical that, you know,

::

we're here sort of advocating for this worldview of Pilates,

::

that it is in fact a fucking system and that you, when you're doing your mid-back

::

or your arms and straps in 90-90, you know, tabletop,

::

like that's overhead, right? It's just the baby version of overhead.

::

And if you do it in tabletop, you're breaking the system. Right.

::

And if you do it in, like, if you do it in tabletop in neutral spine,

::

because overhead, you have to flex your fucking spine and flex your hips maximally to get up there.

::

If you think about it as a system, and, you know, we can't know what Joseph

::

Pilates were thinking, but, you know, people always, you know,

::

all the Pilates purists, they talk about, oh, Pilates is a system,

::

you have to understand it, you can't just do it on the reformer.

::

It's like, I think we fucking understand it at this point. I think,

::

you know, I think this is what it's about.

::

It's like you're working up to those bigger, you know, expressions of the movement.

::

And so if you don't get there, that's fine. You know, we all have our strengths

::

and flexibilities and our body proportions and whatever.

::

It's like understanding that, you know, exercise A is just an easier version

::

or a prep or a piece in the puzzle towards, you know, exercise B or exercise C.

::

You know, to me, that's understanding the system of Pilates. Pilates is a system.

::

And when you, you know, I think the people who break exercises down into smaller

::

and smaller parts, you know, conversely by going like, okay,

::

when you're doing mid-back, think about this in your scapula and this in your

::

humerus and this in your hip.

::

And this is like, okay, what about making the movement bigger?

::

You know, um, I think they quite mistake the matter. And I think that's actually

::

not what the system of Pilates is all about.

::

You know, it's like what, what we were talking about last time,

::

count the legs and divide by

::

four, you know, like it could give too many cues to do a simple movement.

::

Um, let's move on to. And so just quickly as a quick aside on that, you know, um.

::

A counterpoint to that, that I've talked about a lot with people is, and it simmers down to,

::

as an instructor, as a facilitator of movement for other people,

::

you're going to be vulnerable to those narratives if you don't feel confident

::

about adding load to a movement.

::

And the thing that unlocked all of this for me years and years ago,

::

now thank God, was understanding, as we've said before, that load is the important variable, not form.

::

And then more than that is.

::

What does it look like when someone is approaching a point where the load is

::

too much? And too much means they can't do another rep.

::

And then unlocking the truth that the form as it's laid out in what you ask

::

for, so the rules of the game that you make, will dissipate as people approach fatigue.

::

And if that hasn't happened at eight or ten reps you're

::

in you're in the go zone for making things harder either

::

through bigger movements or through more load like

::

you've seen that the person can control that movement for eight to ten reps

::

you can add load or complexity yeah so you actually so it completely flips the

::

paradigm and that does take some thinking so you know i think as as because

::

we don't no one wants to hurt their clients so if you're told at pilates school that,

::

moving incorrectly is dangerous. Well, of course you don't want to move people incorrectly.

::

But the sad truth is that if you've been taught that like that.

::

What if that was not true? What if it was just 100% untrue bullshit?

::

Right. Right. That's the question you've got to ask yourself.

::

What if it's not true? And then work back from there.

::

And it's like, because it's not, right? The thing is, if you can do the movement

::

and it looks smooth, you don't need to break it down any further.

::

You need to look at where it's going.

::

But if it wasn't true, then people could do all kinds of things.

::

Like if it wasn't true that moving wrong you

::

know will hurt you then we'd see

::

i mean that that can't be right because if

::

it was if it wasn't true then we would see people doing things

::

crazy things like wrestling bridges without hurting themselves or break dancing

::

without hurting themselves or like advanced yoga poses i mean a leg behind the

::

head uh non-neutral spine without hurting like we'd We'd see powerlifters lifting

::

like hundreds of kilos with a rounded spine.

::

Like we'd see all of those things if it wasn't true that moving wrong would hurt you. Oh, hold on.

::

We do see all of those things. Yeah. Huh.

::

All right. So tell me about why you've got a thing about tuck versus tabletop.

::

Uh, I've got a few things about why I've got a thing about tuck versus tabletop,

::

but one of the things I've got is, or, or hold on, hold on, hold on,

::

tell me why you've got a thing about not moving the carriage stopper out so

::

that you can't bend your hips beyond 90 degrees when you do footwork,

::

which is kind of the same thing, right?

::

Uh, my, I'm not sure I'm catching. Well, like that lady, like that Pilates instructor,

::

I'm assuming she was a lady, like that Pilates instructor came over and adjusted

::

your carriage so that you couldn't flex your hips past, you know,

::

the quote, you know, the point of no return, you know,

::

90 degrees of hip flexion. Oh my God.

::

If you ever do, if you ever do go past 90 degrees of hip flexion,

::

I'll feel a disturbance in the force. I'll know, I'll know you're gone. Yeah.

::

Well, if you don't do that, then you.

::

You can't bring, so bringing your knees to your armpits or as deep as you can,

::

is going to help you posteriorly tilt your pelvis, which is going to help you

::

flex your spine, which is going to help you go into the tuck shape.

::

Going into the tuck shape is the only way that you're going to be able to do

::

rolling back, jackknife, roll up, roll over, uh, like insert Pilates exercise here.

::

When you do the mat work exercise, which apparently, you know

::

is the true thing which i mean i fucking love

::

matt is it's essentially

::

a rolling practice when you do return to life

::

through contrology in sequence you're just rolling back and forth and when people

::

come and do my mat class they go dude you do a lot of rolling it's like yeah

::

rolling's kind of like you know so that and i say that i mean any of the movements

::

where you want to get to your shoulders, you're going to need to go into flexion.

::

And that's tuck. That's a tuck position.

::

It's just not. And then you look at the photos of Joseph doing long stretch,

::

which is an upside down hollow body on the reformer.

::

He's in full flexion. Full flexion of the spine is the tuck position.

::

And, you know, Raf could explain it better than me, but the full flexion of

::

your lumbar spine is flat.

::

It doesn't flex, and some people do, but roughly speaking, it flexes too flat.

::

So putting your lower back on the bed, which allows you to roll back and forth.

::

That is the natural end range of your lumbar spine.

::

It's designed to go there and it's functional in Pilates because you want to roll.

::

Not to mention, it's actually what Joseph wrote in his books and instructions.

::

Yeah. Right. And it's just fucking cat stretch. Like when you do,

::

why is it, you know, it's like if you're doing cat stretch, you should do tuck position.

::

If you, if then maybe some of us are still queuing not to go into full flexion in cat stretch, which,

::

uh i'm just looking here through um return to life through contrology and um,

::

looking at say the double leg stretch uh,

::

he says draw both legs upward and forward with lock wrists and hold them firmly

::

in the double up position, pull the legs towards you and press them firmly against chest, end quote.

::

Yeah. It's like, that's pretty cool. That's not tabletop.

::

It's not tabletop. Single leg, the one leg stretch, the one leg stretch,

::

pull left leg as far as possible toward chest, you know?

::

That's pretty clear. Going back to Raf's point about if bad movement was dangerous,

::

then we wouldn't see, insert high-level movement athlete person here.

::

Then the argument is, yeah, but the people I teach are not athletes.

::

Yeah, why not? Because you never let them move. Right.

::

What do athletes do different? Oh, they move. Okay, great. So if you want to

::

be more like an athlete, what should you do?

::

Do more of that. They load, right? Right. They load and push into their capacities

::

at an appropriate level.

::

Seriously, again, I don't want

::

to be facetious here. And I was that instructor for many years, right?

::

I've done all these things many, you know, hundreds if not thousands of times.

::

But, you know, thinking about this, right? Okay, my clients,

::

you know, my clients can't do X, Y, and Z.

::

They can't do a full back bend. They can't do, you know, knees to chest.

::

They can't, you know, get up out of a chair properly.

::

They've got a sore shoulder, right? and then there's

::

this athlete you know a break dancer oh they can do the splits and

::

touch their toes and do this spinal extension and put their

::

head on their butt and whatever right okay so my

::

clients shouldn't do those things and shouldn't train like that person because

::

they can't do those things no your client can't do those things because they

::

don't train like that person that is why it's the reverse causality right it's

::

like saying like oh my client can't get my client can't go to hospital because he's not well.

::

It's like, no, you go to hospital to get well, right?

::

My client can't, you know, doesn't have the flexibility, therefore he shouldn't stretch.

::

Yeah, my client can't do a push-up, therefore he shouldn't do push-ups.

::

It's like your client can't do a push-up because your client doesn't do push-ups,

::

right? It's back to front.

::

It's totally back to front. Anyway, back to you.

::

Sorry, I deroured your train of thought. Yeah, I don't know.

::

I don't even know what I was talking about. But you're a...

::

What did you ask me? What's my thing about tuck? Yeah, so where did we get to tabletop?

::

You know, like, so tuck is the position, right? So when you're thinking about

::

pelagias as a system, you're thinking about we're moving towards,

::

you know, these body shapes that impacts person a full exercise.

::

And whether, again, whether any individual person gets to each particular move

::

doesn't fucking matter at all. who cares if you can do it, you know,

::

overhead or whatever. Absolutely.

::

But that's where it's going, right? That's where it's heading towards,

::

right? So we've got to do something.

::

We can't just roll around on the floor, you know, in a sock and say it's interpretive dance.

::

Like we have to have some kind of structure activity that we do when we come into a Pilates class.

::

And so what do we do in Pilates class? We work towards doing the Pilates moves.

::

I mean, that seems pretty, I think we can probably all agree on that.

::

That, and so tuck really is, you know, the essence of, you know,

::

so many of those Pilates moves.

::

If you think about the hundred, any of those things, it's like it's back flat

::

on the mat, it's rounding the low back, it's, you know, all of that stuff, right?

::

And then you go into hundreds, you go into rolling back, you go into all of

::

that, you know, they're the same rolling up, et cetera.

::

So, but what's wrong with doing tabletop?

::

Well, nothing. The tabletop's a place that you stop at on the way from flexion to extension.

::

Problem is, to quote our boy, what's his name?

::

Did you want to do a middle split? Got to spend time in middle.

::

Oh, yeah, Christopher Summer.

::

Yeah, he was asked about neutral spine, and he said, to quote, fuck neutral.

::

We don't teach neutral. It's not an athletic position, because you can't do anything from there.

::

Christopher Summer, 20-year coach of the U.S.

::

Men's gymnastics team. I think he knows a thing or two about gymnastics coaching.

::

I'm not sure, but I think he does. Yeah, he's probably got a few thoughts on it.

::

Well, and they're his words, not mine, from a podcast I heard years and years

::

ago, which as you can probably imagine made me sit up and listen.

::

And in deference to people who've been taught that the significance of neutral

::

is your ability to co-contract the abdominals,

::

the spinal extensors, and then can you manage your hip flexors and somehow turn

::

them off while you do loaded hip flexion, right?

::

To Raf's question of what's wrong.

::

Learning to co-contract muscles to stop movement is a dissociation game.

::

And every now and again, dissociation is something you need to do as a skill

::

to make a movement more efficient.

::

But in that case, you're learning the skill of

::

dissociation to make yourself less efficient and it doesn't

::

protect you from injury and it doesn't build strength because

::

it's held over long periods of endurance

::

until your hip flexors freak out and you can't do Pilates

::

because you can't do 58 reps without your hip flexors

::

freaking out i want to just take i want to take the last three

::

four minutes that we got here before we got to finish up and i just want

::

to talk about that concept and how it relates to learning and skill because

::

you touched on like efficiency there and efficiency is one of the hallmarks

::

of skill like as you become more skilled in the movement like by definition

::

you become more efficient so you use less effort to achieve the same output

::

and um when you're teaching somebody you know dear listener you you'll know

::

this from your own experience.

::

When you're teaching somebody something, you can basically teach anyone anything

::

if you've got long enough, right? So if you had a thousand years, you could.

::

Probably it's not worth the time and effort, but if you had enough repetitions, you probably could.

::

And so, dear listener, if you're teaching somebody to do something really that

::

they know how to do really well, right?

::

So just say you're, you know, you're coaching some kind of like super advanced,

::

like elite, you know, tennis player or something like that, right?

::

And they're in the middle of a match and you're like, okay, you know,

::

see when the opponent's hitting the ball, like they're always hitting it a bit

::

short. So what I want you to do is I want you to place it just a little bit

::

longer in your next volley, right?

::

That is the level of instruction you would give to an elite tennis player, right?

::

Notice I gave zero instructions about which fucking muscles to use,

::

what to do with your fingers on the grip, on the maturial racket,

::

your follow through, any of that, right?

::

It's place the ball a bit longer, right? So it's the outcome of the movement.

::

Whereas a beginner, first tennis lesson, what would you say?

::

You wouldn't say place the ball a bit longer.

::

You'd say, here's how you hold the racket and your fingers go here.

::

Okay, now you put your foot here, you put your other foot here.

::

Now you swim, here's how you swing, right? You would give them like much more

::

minute, detailed instructions, right?

::

And that is, you know, somewhat appropriate for a beginner to get more,

::

you know, like if you're teaching someone to answer emails in your business,

::

you would like, okay, a total beginner, imagine you're teaching my mum to send

::

emails. You're like, okay, this is a computer.

::

Here's how you turn it on. This is the email program we use.

::

Here's how to type. Like you would have to go through all the basics, right?

::

Then if you didn't get someone who's very advanced, you'd be just like,

::

okay, the templates you're

::

in a folder called xyz you know you'll figure it

::

out right and then off you go give them less instruction they can

::

figure it out now when somebody's really good at pilates

::

dear listener here's where we get back to the actual point okay and you're saying

::

they've done like 100 pilates classes and you're saying to them okay we're going

::

to do this movement so start by gently engaging your pelvic floor don't move

::

your hips beyond 90 degrees be a neutral spine contract your transverse abdominis

::

and your lumbar multifidus okay lengthen your shoulder blades any back,

::

you're doing the equivalent of saying, here's how you hold your racket and.

::

Put your feet here, et cetera. And that is how you make people regress in terms of their skill.

::

Like if you take that, imagine if you gave that elite tennis player and they're

::

like, you know, two match points short of winning Wimbledon and they come like,

::

okay, coach, what should I do in this last point? You know, it's match point.

::

And the coach is like, okay, well make sure you hold your racket like this and

::

swing when you follow through and don't use your shoulder too much.

::

Cause sometimes, you know, use your shoulder too much and put your feet here

::

and make sure you keep your weight balanced.

::

They're going to cause them to overthink the fuck out of that movement and stuff it up, right?

::

So you want to keep them, you want to use the highest level of instruction possible

::

given that person's level of skill.

::

And so this is like when we like quote teach in Pilates a lot of the time,

::

we're teaching more advanced people, we're giving them the super basic instructions

::

like put your foot here, swing through, bring your arm up, et cetera.

::

It's like they already fucking know, dude, they already know it.

::

So the point is, when we give people more detailed instructions than they need,

::

it's not actually just a waste of breath. It's actually actively regressing

::

their learning, is making them a worse mover.

::

That's what it's doing. All right, rant over.

::

So, um, at the end of the day, I've got to,

::

I just want to catch that as you know, as I've got to jump on teacher class,

::

but I think we should bookmark a continuation of this conversation and talk about dissociation.

::

We'll talk about the movement that we call flamingos and how that relates to

::

hands in straps and to reverse knee stretches and talk about, um,

::

you know, cause the whole idea of neutral, keeping neutral while you do the

::

strap press or the leg extension and however many more muscles you cue to while you do that.

::

The dissociation game is one that's really, really viral in Pilates teaching.

::

And I often get people saying, so you don't teach dissociation.

::

I teach it all the time when it helps people be more efficient at the movement that I want them to do.

::

And i think that deserves an unpack because we're not you know dissociation is not a bad thing,

::

but teaching it like raf just explained for the

::

sake of making well what the first long for making

::

things more exactly so dissociation's everywhere right right right right exactly

::

so i think we should next time we talk we should talk about this idea of flamingo

::

and when you teach it and how dissociation is a, it's a good thing to teach because,

::

but it's taking the dissociation somewhere rather than just continually drilling it.

::

Well, it's just, it's just taking one thing in isolation.

::

You're going shoulder flexion. It's like, okay, don't you teach shoulder extension?

::

No, we don't teach shoulder extension. It's like, no, sometimes flexion's good.

::

Sometimes extension's good. Sometimes you're in the middle.

::

It's like, you just do whatever's appropriate to the movement.

::

Like you need a full repertoire and vocabulary of movements.

::

Yeah. Don't get obsessed with one freaking thing.

::

All right. Good talk. Ciao, bye. See you later.

About the Podcast

Show artwork for Pilates Elephants
Pilates Elephants
No-BS, science-based tools to help you become a better, happier and more financially successful Pilates instructor

About your host

Profile picture for Raphael Bender

Raphael Bender