Episode 315
315. Can Pilates Make You Stronger? with Heath Lander and Raphael Bender
In this episode, Raphael and Heath challenge the myth that Pilates doesn’t build strength. They break down the science of strength adaptations, clarify what “strength” really means, and explain how Pilates can be a legitimate strength training method—when done right.
Key Topics:
- What counts as “strength” and how it’s measured
- Why effort (not burn or soreness) drives adaptation
- How load, reps, and proximity to failure matter more than equipment
- Debunking common myths around bodyweight vs. external load
- How to apply strength principles in Pilates for real results
Takeaway for Instructors:
You can—and should—train your clients for strength using Pilates. This episode will give you the tools to do it.
Connect with me on Instagram: @the_raphaelbender
Connect with Heath on Instagram: @contrologycollective
Download a free course guide:
This podcast uses the following third-party services for analysis:
AdBarker - https://adbarker.com/privacy
Transcript
WEBVTT
::Music.
::Welcome to Pilates Elephants. I'm Raphael Bender. I'm here with my friend Heath
::Lander. Hey, Heath. Hey, Raf.
::Can Pilates make you stronger? Yes or no?
::Absolutely, it can. Okay, good talk. See you later. See you later.
::So that's a little bit of a topical question going around. We want to unpack
::that today, dear listener.
::And, uh, turns out the answer is only if you do it right.
::So, um.
::Where do we start with this one? I think, well, when, when we, I think, I think,
::firstly, I think when we were both growing up in as polite baby Pilates instructors,
::we were taught that every exercise has a particular spring setting, you know,
::two, two red springs for short spine three to four for footwork you know two
::for hundreds whatever it was,
::yeah and you know some of
::those had a little bit of variation like if you know if you couldn't do like
::kneeling arms on one spring you could do it on half a spring you know but like
::heaven forbid you do it on three springs i mean that was just inconceivable
::you know um uh and so there was this basic concept that,
::you have a spring setting that is right for a person.
::So most people do kneeling arms on one spring, but some people will need to
::do on a half spring and that's totally fine if that's the right number for them.
::But there was no concept that you start on a half spring and then you get to one spring.
::It was like, well, what happens after you get to one spring?
::Do you just stay there forever? And the answer was, yeah, basically that's what you do.
::Stay on one spring forever. Yeah.
::And when I've thought long and hard on that,
::I think I've got, there's two things I think about with that and the things
::that, and talk about in workshops is, uh, one, maybe the rationale is that you're developing a practice.
::So like more like, like a, a sequence, like a yoga asana sequence, vinyasa or whatever.
::Well, like a Tai Chi form or a Kung Fu, you know, form or a Karate Kana, you know?
::Yeah, so once you've established the movement sequence, then you just forever
::more drill more deeply into the nuance of how you're doing the movement rather
::than where you're adding load. Yeah.
::So you're going deeper into the practice, into the work, capital W. Capital W. Yeah.
::And, I mean, you and I both started in martial arts. Yeah.
::Or maybe you started in yoga. Did you do yoga first in martial arts?
::We both started martial arts.
::Yeah, yeah, yeah. So we both started martial arts. And martial arts,
::we both started in Chinese martial arts where you did a lot of forms.
::And a form is basically just, dear listener, it's like just a sequence of,
::you know, kung fu moves that you do, you know, and it's the same sequence that
::you do over and over, very lots and lots, thousands and thousands and thousands
::of repetitions of, you know, this flowing sequence.
::And the idea is to make it more and more flowing, more and more precise as you
::do it over the years and the decades until you become a master of it.
::And so that's kind of the way that I think, you know, Pilates is often taught,
::certainly not by everyone.
::And there is a real beauty and value in that type of practice,
::which is it becomes a moving meditation.
::And you, you know, get into a flow state and you do start to really tune into
::your body and tune into just the rhythm of the movement.
::And, you know, so there is a real beauty and value in that, but it doesn't make you stronger.
::Doesn't make you stronger. I think just quickly as a sidebar,
::I think one of the things that this, you know, the debates that we have in Pilates land,
::sometimes a little bit reductionist, like it's almost become sort of factionalized,
::like, you know, the reform is a wildly variable tool.
::So you can do a flowing self-practice, which is about exactly what you just described.
::And you can do movements under varying loads to make yourself stronger or you
::can also do things to work on your flexibility.
::But don't I have to just choose one camp?
::Well, that seems to be the kind of implied thing that we all have to be of a camp.
::But I personally think, yeah, I think it's a, the tool itself is such a kind
::of weird and nuanced thing that to say it's just one thing is odd.
::Well, I think what's so cool about it is it's not just one thing. I mean- Yeah, exactly.
::It's so versatile. That's its superpower, right? It's not the best tool for improving strength.
::It's not the best tool for improving flexibility. It's not, but it's a really
::good tool for both of those things and many other things besides.
::Right. And it also has the, I mean, you just mentioned two of the three big,
::well, the three dimensions of movement and the other is neuromotor control,
::you've got an unstable surface with a horizontal force vector.
::That's pretty cool for stability, whatever we call stability training.
::It's pretty freaking cool.
::Yeah. All right. So, dear listener, everything in life is a trade-off.
::There's no perfect solution.
::And every form of exercise, you know, whether it's using bands or body weight
::or barbells or machine weights or a Pilates reformer or a Cadillac or a stability
::chair or whatever, they all have their trade-offs.
::They're better at some things at the expense of being worse at other things.
::You know, so with, say, for example, bands, well, they're amazing.
::They're so flexible. Like you can fly and carry them in your hotel room and whatever.
::But it's like you can't just can't create enough resistance with them to develop
::serious strength you know and if you did there's a real chance of them snapping
::and hitting you in the eye,
::um and so you know they're good for some things and not
::good you know not as good for other things and and that come one comes at the
::expense of the other and then you've got something at the opposite end of the
::spectrum like you've got a massive like weight stack in the gym that weighs
::a ton and you couldn't possibly take in a semi-trailer let alone on an airplane
::and it's fucking amazing for developing strength,
::but like there's no requirement for really for control and it doesn't improve your flexibility much.
::So, and then, you know, so each of these pieces of equipment has kind of some kind of superpower,
::and the superpower of the Pilates reformer is it's good, very good,
::I would say at everything, but it's not the best at anything. Yeah. Well said.
::I mean, you can't really take it on a plane. Let's, let's face it.
::It kind of sucks in that regard.
::So one thing i actually there's there's so
::much around this topic i want to i'd love
::to talk about and in some cases pick your brain
::about i was running a workshop on the weekend and it was a group of really smart
::switched on curious instructors and we were talking about layers and clusters
::and as part of that we talk about you know that you can train for specific things
::So you can do strength training,
::you can do range of motion training, you can do stability skill training.
::I'm just going to quickly sidebar here and say layers is when you start easy
::and then you do a slightly harder version, slightly harder version of the same move.
::And clusters is a sequence of moves all in the same body position without changing
::the equipment settings that you can basically, you know, alternate muscle groups
::in this without kind of jumping around all over the reformer.
::Yeah. And-
::Yes, so we're talking about that and that if you're training for strength,
::there are particular conditions you want to create.
::And if you're training for skill, there are particular conditions you want to
::create. And same for ROM.
::And the idea in that particular conversation was that we're going to work on
::layers that are oriented towards load, towards strength.
::And as we had that conversation, we said, okay, how do we measure strength?
::So we measure strength through repetitions maximum.
::So that means how many reps you can do. And then we talk about how when you,
::if you actually want to get stronger, the reps need to, you need to be able
::to do less than X, let's say 20.
::Right. So sorry, I just want to, again, hold that thought. I want to just quickly
::unpack that for a second.
::So when we say like you measure strength by how many reps you can do.
::So what we don't mean is if you can do a hundred reps, you're stronger than if you can do 20 reps.
::That's not what we mean. What we mean is you make a load so heavy that you can only do six reps, right?
::And so that's how we measure strength. If you can do seven reps with that same
::load, then you got stronger, right?
::Or if you can lift a heavier load for six reps, then you got stronger.
::Yeah. And that the measurement convention is repetitions maximum.
::So if you can do six, but physically not seven, like you actually can't do it,
::then it's six RM at that weight is your current strength. Right.
::And the weight that you use if you want to build
::strength has to be heavy enough that you physically cannot
::do and then of course this is a continuum not a a binary
::so it's somewhere around the 20 rep max
::is where you know you're getting stronger which means you physically
::can't do 21 or you physically can't do 18 and then
::the other you know beauty about that that that
::evidence is that you don't have to
::do it to complete failure so but you
::do need to do it to a point where your form dissipates
::so you lose range of motion you look a
::bit sketchy you're you know you're not making it smooth and beautiful you're
::struggling to do those last few and so that that's the conversation where i
::was having and did you want to double click on something yeah i just took again
::to briefly unpack because there's a there's a concept we've covered in detail
::in previous episodes but just in case,
::dear listener, you haven't yet listened to all 313 of the previous episodes, shame on you.
::Strength and there's a continuum. Like it's not like a certain number of reps
::will build strength and if you go one rep over that, it won't build strength.
::If you want to maximize strength, you need to lift really heavy and that means
::you can only do a very few number of reps.
::Like if you're lifting like three reps and then you can't do a fourth,
::that's going of very close to maximize your strength.
::Whereas if you can lift 50 reps, right, you're,
::probably going to, over a long enough time horizon, increase your strength by
::1%, but it's going to be far, far slower, and you're going to get much more.
::Let me just zoom out again. At the maximizing strength end of the spectrum,
::you've got basically one rep max, so just lifting the amount you can only lift once.
::That's how elite strength athletes like Olympic weightlifters train.
::They do one rep when they train.
::And then at the other end, if we go zoom all the way down to the other end,
::we've got like ultra marathons where you do like 50,000 steps, you know, in a row.
::That's one set of 50,000 reps, right?
::And you will get literally zero, possibly negative muscle growth,
::you know, from doing that, right?
::Now that is cardio, right? So strength and cardio are not different things.
::They're just on a continuum.
::They're on a continuum. And there's a crossover point somewhere in the middle
::where it's like a bit of both.
::And the crossover point turns out
::it's somewhere more than 20 reps and somewhere less than about 35 reps.
::So if you're doing more than 35 reps, it's basically just cardio.
::And if you're doing less than 20 reps, probably it's mostly strengthening.
::And if you're doing somewhere in between 20 and 35, it's probably a bit of both.
::Nice. Well said. So that idea, and in the conversation we were having is when you're.
::Programming or calling to a group class, if you're calling loads,
::and this brings us to the topic of the fixed spring setting or not,
::if you're calling loads,
::right, where people can do,
::let's say more than 20 or even more than 30 as
::is so often the case and what we mean by that dear
::listener is if you've caught a spring tension for a group and
::they're still going at 25 reps and they look okay then they
::can probably do 50 right so that's the sort of listener it's not how
::many reps you do do it's how many you could do
::that determines whether you're going to get a stimulus or not based
::on the load yeah and when
::you so when you choose loads that are at that level that
::allow people lots of reps well that would be where you
::practice the nuances of a particular movement
::or you add load add stability challenges because people have got capacity to
::absorb challenge but if you want to build strength then the movement that you
::do needs to be loaded such that let's say hopefully everyone in the room can't
::do 20 if raf's in the room he's going to do 20,
::but then if I'm in the room, I'm going to do 12 because I'm not as strong as Ralph.
::And if my mum's in the room, she's going to do two because she's not as strong as me.
::Or if we're doing, I don't know, teaser snaps, you might do 20 and I might do four.
::You know, that'd be my maximum. Yeah, yeah.
::And what I was sort of, the conversation I had with this crew that I'm trying
::to get around to recapturing was...
::Firstly loading things so that we've got it heavy
::enough that you can't do the 20 and then
::it's obviously complicated by the fact that you're teaching a group and
::everyone's got different abilities and then someone sort
::of put to put forward the point that you know
::proper strength training is really only six rm
::or heavy i can't remember if that was a six rm and i what we
::then talked about was and you've already
::said it nestled in that sidebar is if
::we're going to be serious like properly serious about
::strength training the conditions that we need and this
::is sort of a question and to you and also just a
::sharing is where does the optimal strength training happen it happens on a stable
::surface with a predictable load like a barbell that you know is what it's going
::to do and you're very familiar with the movement so you're efficient and you
::can build efficiency and so that the conversation i have with them is like they're the they're the,
::preconditions for optimal strength training plus the load.
::So stability, predictability, and familiarity with the movement.
::I would say, yeah, so some degree of stability.
::Like, again, these things are not binary. They're a continuum.
::Yeah, yeah, absolutely. And then, you know, this is the interesting thing about
::all of this, and there's so many threads in my head about this topic at the
::moment. So when we look at this on the reformer, it's a very unstable surface in a lot of movements.
::So like I say, a diagonal strap pull or wood chopper, as it's often called, right?
::So I'm going up on a high knee with… Right. Well, you've got multiple layers
::or dimensions of instability because the carriage is moving in one direction
::and that's unstable when you're on it.
::And so then you're changing position yourself. and so there's inertia from your
::body, plus the strap is unstable in all, you know, in all planes.
::So yeah, there's multiple layers of instability there. Whereas if you're on
::a, if you're doing a like bench press on a, you know, on a stable bench,
::the barbell's pretty unstable.
::Like the very heavy object that can go and move in any direction really wants
::to move down, but you know, it could go anyway.
::But you're on a stable surface, so the barbell's the only unstable thing.
::Whereas on a reformer, like your legs and your arms, potentially in a woodchopper
::or kneeling arms or whatever, are both attached to unstable surfaces.
::Yeah. And you're being essentially pulled in opposite directions.
::The springs are pulling your knees one way and the straps pulling your arms another way. Right.
::So you've got this highly unstable movement. And so then thinking of that as
::a strength training context is kind of flawed because the major problem you're solving is balance.
::So then it's the, but then the paradox of that is the more familiar you become
::with the movement, the more efficient you are at stabilizing,
::the more load you can tolerate.
::So if you wanted, so that movement like a wood chopper, so you're kneeling sideways
::on the carriage, you've got a strap in two hands and you're,
::you know, twisting towards the foot bar, you know.
::And so, you know, if you wanted to bias that towards more strength development,
::which would come at the expense of less motor control, right, development,
::you would sit on your heels so that you reduce the instability.
::And now that wouldn't eliminate the instability, but it reduces it significantly.
::And then you would add another full spring or more because, because of that
::increased instability, you can now move more load or you would just grasp the
::strap a bit closer down the rope towards the pulleys, which would achieve the same thing.
::Great. Exactly. So yeah.
::So then the question then is, because what have we said? Does Pilates make you
::stronger? We're talking about reformer.
::So then it's like, is the reformer good for strength? They say,
::well, then what? Fuck yeah. Right.
::And if we say we want to make people stronger with the reformer,
::then one argument here would be focus on movements that are as stable as possible, blah, blah, blah.
::So push-ups off the foot bar is about as stable as a horizontal push as you
::can create on the reformer versus kneeling punches where you've got the same
::problem as the diagonal strap pull.
::So if you're going to, at the point in your program when you want to make people
::stronger, you pick a movement that you can make stable for most people,
::you know, as stable as possible, roughly predictable, and they can be familiar
::with it. So for me, that's like a push-up off the foot bar.
::Right. And then when you go to the diagonal strap pulls, it's like,
::okay, as you said, this is a combination of everything. I'm going to start low
::and get used to the load, and then I'm going to play around with the knees and
::the hips and the arms, which is where reform is fun, right?
::Like they're funky moves that you can't do anywhere else.
::Right. And dear listener, like, you know, we're injecting some nuance into this
::here, and we're not saying that you must go hard on highly stable,
::highly loaded movements 100% of the time in all your reformer classes.
::That's not what we're saying. What we're saying is you can do it all.
::You can build strength by doing simple, stable, high load movements,
::and that only is going to take you 15 minutes out of your class to get everyone super strong.
::Then you can also spend 15 minutes doing like cool funky shit like twisty things
::with the low springs and balletic and all that shit and then you can spend 15
::minutes doing stretchy stuff as well.
::Or any other combination, but it doesn't, you can do it all.
::That's the beauty of this machine. It does it all.
::Right. And you can do all of that in a cluster rather than having blocks in your program, right?
::So you can do a cluster, which we're saying is multiple movements and muscle
::groups in one basic position where the equipment setting stays roughly the same.
::And you can change, you can actually change the equipment settings to use different
::muscle groups and to focus on different outputs like strength or stability.
::Right. Long stretch on half a spring abs, long stretch on three springs arms.
::Right. And in between you step off and do some flying splits.
::And because you can access the springs and the foot bar, those transitions are
::quick and simple, especially with a little bit of practice.
::So one of the questions I want to ask you, Raph,
::is there are things that happen physiologically and neuromuscularly or neurologically
::when you become stronger.
::You talked about that last week and you probably talked about it in depth in other podcasts.
::We talk about it a lot in the programs.
::So when I go and do, let's keep using the woodchopper as an example.
::When I go and do woodchoppers, this diagonal strap pull. Let's call it drawing
::the sword or swakati or some traditional Pilates name.
::Okay, but I'm going to say a two-handed version rather than the single-handed
::version because I want to maximize. I'm just, you know, giving you shit.
::Okay, right, right. So our two-handed swakati, which might be swakati's,
::we're diagonally strap pulling.
::Right now i get used to the movement over x number
::of classes or x number of practices and i
::work out that with my knees wider i've got a better base of support
::with my elbows bent i'm more athletic against the spring tension if i lean into
::the strap a little bit more i can offset the load all of those little efficiencies
::that i work out with practice and over time i discover wow cool i can do this
::on one and a half or two springs and i'm getting down below 15 reps right so it's okay,
::I've gotten below the 20 threshold for effective strengthening.
::I've become efficient enough with the stability challenges that I'm not feeling
::like I'm going to fall over.
::My question to you is, what's the cost to the physiological effects of strengthening of that?
::Did you know where I'm going with that? Is that making you stronger or is it
::making you a kind of better athlete in a particular construct?
::Well, it's a trade-off, right?
::So if you want to maximize your strength, you would just sit on your heels,
::on the reformer, put all of the springs on, grasp the strap as close as possible
::to the pulley, and just pull for all you're worth.
::And if you twist and lean and distort, it doesn't matter, just like freaking
::pull that thing, dude, right?
::Hard as you can. And if you can only do two and a half reps,
::perfect, perfect, right? And those reps should look ugly.
::So that's if you want to maximize strength.
::Whereas at the other end, if you want to maximize control, now,
::when you maximize strength, it's going to look ugly, right?
::So it's at the expense of what we would call, you know, control.
::Now, really, strength is, control is embedded in strength.
::So in order to express strength, you have to have control, but it's just not
::conscious control where you're consciously looking pretty while you do the movement,
::but your motor cortex is going to organize your body by the very act of leaning
::and grimacing and twisting and hiking your shoulder and whatever,
::that actually enables you to express more strength.
::So that is control. It's just not pretty control.
::But if you wanted to maximize pretty control, right, the finer,
::you know, doing it an artisanal way, then you would do a light spring,
::and you would move slowly and you would focus on developing the fluidity and,
::you know, lots of repetitions to build practice.
::Like if you're practicing a scale on a musical instrument, hundreds and hundreds
::of reps to, you know, really perfect it.
::And that would build almost no strength, right?
::And so at one end, we've got lots of strength and almost no control.
::And the other, we've got lots of control, almost no strength.
::And in the middle, you've got
::a bit of both, right? And so if you've got like a couple of springs on.
::You know, and you're kneeling and you've got two hands and you're not making
::it super ugly, but you're also, it doesn't look like, you know,
::Barajnikov dancing Swan Lake,
::you know, there's some element of control and some element of strength development there.
::Now, the maximum amount of strength you can develop in that position is going
::to be less than if you just sat on your heels and put all the springs on, right?
::But it's still going to be substantial, you know, so... If you can't do 20.
::If you can't do 20, yeah. yep and you
::go until your form dissipates notably right and
::so here's here's where we get to my first kind of
::answer to that question of like can pilates make
::you stronger it's like well depends where you fucking start from you know and
::depends how you do pilates and so if you do pilates the way that we're talking
::about it where you try and create situations at certain points in the session
::where the person can't do 20 reps,
::because it's just too much load for them to go beyond that, well,
::yeah, they will get stronger, right?
::But the limitation on the machine is because you've only got five springs on there.
::At some point, you've got all five springs on, right? And there is no more.
::You can't go stronger than that. I mean, you can grasp the strap a little bit
::higher, but it's eventually like you run out of strap, you run out of springs,
::you run out of carriage stopper positions, and that's as hard as you can go.
::Whereas on a barbell, there is essentially an infinite amount of extra weight you can add, right?
::So the barbell's got so many spots on the end of it, that's like the strongest
::human in the world doesn't run out of space on the barbell.
::So that's effectively uncapped right
::and that's the that's the superpower of barbells but guess what you
::can't stretch on a barbell you know like you can't
::do strike a tee on a barbell so so the
::beauty of the reformer is not that it's it's not a
::it's not like super specialized for strength and the the drawback of that is
::like will you develop elite world-class strength and conditioning levels of
::strength on a reformer no you will not no you will not but can you get like
::double as strong as the average human on planet Earth. Yes, you fucking can. Honor a former.
::And so it just depends, like, how strong do you want to get?
::And I think, just let me catch you there, too. I think one of the things,
::I've had this conversation a lot, when someone does have a handle on strength
::training, then their position becomes, well, the reformer's not great for strength
::training. So fair enough.
::Exactly as you just said, Raf, if we're talking about the pointy end of strength
::training, the super nerd factor of strength training, don't use a reformer.
::It just isn't the right tool.
::But who comes to group, you know, my brain is always oriented to the group reformer world.
::And so who comes to group reformer?
::35-year-old women who are slightly overweight and out of shape.
::Like now, dear listener, if that's not you, don't take offense, right?
::But like your average brand new client who walks in the door,
::you know, that's basically the profile, right?
::Yeah. and even if they're not female and even if
::they're not 35 and even if they're not slightly out of shape they're
::usually trying this out because they've heard it's kind of cool or it's a cool
::way to exercise because they don't like tennis or the gym and so they're not
::you know the number of people who come into a reformer class and say i don't
::care about anything but strength is exactly zero hi i'm i'm i'm a nationally
::competitive olympic weightlifter can you help me get stronger.
::Yeah, no, I can't. Not happening in a reformer class. You're helping people
::who quite possibly, and I mean this with all love for my fellow human,
::but the reality is what people generally think is strength training usually isn't.
::So the vast majority of your clients, even if they say they do strength at the
::gym, when you double click, they're doing 15 plus reps and they could have done
::more. So that's not strength training.
::Exactly. And we've got research on this and I've shared it in a previous episode,
::people typically at the gym, the average person, male and female,
::self-selects a load that is 50% of what's required to get stronger.
::So people are choosing a load that's their 20 RMs.
::But they're doing 10 reps. So they're warming up.
::Yeah. So the average person doesn't get stronger at the gym either because they're
::just self-selecting loads that's way too light.
::So it's the two things. Like we said, it's not just like, well,
::it depends where you're starting.
::It also depends how you'd use it, right? So you can get under a barbell and
::not get stronger if you do it wrong. You know, choose a load that's too light
::and you don't do enough reps.
::So it's the same on a reformer, But the limitation with a reformer is the top
::end of strength development is just not available on a reformer.
::But like you say, Heath, like 99.9% of your clients don't give a shit about
::that. And that's not their goal.
::And even, I would say, even the people who've come to my classes from CrossFit
::or Olympic weightlifting or powerlifting, they don't come to reformer to get
::stronger. That's what they go to powerlifting for.
::They come to stretch out and recover and, you know, get their mobility back
::and all of those good things. Yeah, exactly.
::All right, great. So what emerges from this for me is it's really,
::I think it's so important, and this is as a result of the deficit of what I
::learned in my Pilates training on the topic.
::Which I trained you. Yeah.
::For Pilates instructors. there's, well, yeah, we've come a long way together
::to learn about strength and what it is and how you actually do it.
::But then, and maybe this goes to that other topic we had, is that the more sophisticated,
::you know, the more in-depth your understanding.
::In a sense, the less you should share it with people, the less obvious your knowledge should be.
::I feel very confident these days that if you step in front of me on a reformer
::class, I'm going to get you to a strength training output.
::I'm going to get you to those conditions because I've practiced the layers that
::I teach and the clusters that I teach so many times that I can read you and
::I can watch your movement and I'm very confident I'm going to get you there multiple times.
::But I don't talk about it. There's no point telling you about it.
::There's no point saying, now we're doing a strength training phase, folks.
::I just want to get you moving. People don't care about that. They don't care.
::Look, people come to group exercise because they want to be told what to do,
::and they want to do it with other people.
::If they wanted to figure it out themselves, they'd be at the gym or at home
::figuring out themselves.
::Right. The figure it out yourself person doesn't come to group exercise.
::The person who comes to group exercise wants you to give them a session that gives them results.
::And even if they don't know that, the results are what bring them back.
::Right. Yeah. Dear listener, think about if you hired like a private chef, right?
::And to cook your meals for you and your family at home, right?
::You're probably not going to go to the private chef. Oh, show me how to make
::this dish. Show me how to make this dish. It's like, if you wanted to cook,
::you wouldn't have hired a fucking chef.
::You know, you would have gone to cooking classes or something, right?
::So the fact that you hired a chef says you don't fucking want to know how to cook.
::You want someone else to do it for you, right? And that's the chef's job is
::to, so you don't have to worry about it or think about it.
::The food just appears on the table, right? And that's the same with Pilates.
::The people who come to a group performer class, they don't want to think about it.
::They just want you to think about it for them and give them,
::okay, here's what I thought about and here's how to do it.
::Now move your arm, now move your leg, put on this spring, stand up,
::lie down. Good to see you next week.
::So, we take that group context and can we make people stronger?
::And at the pointy end of the conversation is 6RM, 3RM, can't do,
::you know, all of the things we've been talking about.
::And as we've said, there is a huge scope for making people stronger,
::which doesn't have to be as nerdy as that.
::Well, you can get someone to a 3RM. Like there are things I can do,
::like I'm pretty strong, but I can, there are things I can do on a reformer that
::I can't do three reps, like long stretch on zero springs, for example. Yeah. Right.
::And there are a few other things that I could name, you know,
::most of them on zero springs using body weight. Right.
::Where it's like, yeah, I probably couldn't even do one long stretch on zero springs.
::Right. So it's beyond my one RM. So I could definitely improve certain aspects
::of my strength on the reformer.
::But for most people if you just think of a balanced strength routine
::where you're strengthening your legs and your arms and your back and your abs and
::all of that good stuff it's like you're going to run out of springs
::fairly you know after at a certain point but you can absolutely get people a
::lot stronger and i think the limitation is you can get them you know and i don't
::you know i'm just making up numbers here but i would say you could get somebody
::to be like let's say have double the strength of the average person, right?
::The average just punter walking around the streets.
::But you can't get them to elite strength levels, you know, like a power lifter.
::And what we're saying is that broadly,
::actual strengthening is such a rare thing that using the reformer to get people
::looking sketchy at 15 to 20 reps in a movement that's roughly stable,
::you almost certainly just made that person strong.
::And if they're in your class, they're probably not doing systematic strength training elsewhere.
::Right. Fantastic. And even if they do go to the gym, like if they're the average
::person who chooses 20 RM load and does 10 reps, which is what most people do,
::that's what the research tells us,
::well, they probably will get stronger on a reformer in your class than they
::would in the gym sitting on the chess press machine for five minutes scrolling
::Instagram in between sets of 10 reps at their 20 rep max.
::So so so reformer taught well can be better for strengthening than gym workouts
::taught badly yeah right and then catching that just coming back to that uh woodchopper topic,
::if we say reformer taught well and by that we mean in the context of making
::people stronger can be more effective than the gym,
::the considerations are, is the person stable enough in the movement that they
::can put in, their focus is on the strength output, not the I don't want to fall
::over and hurt myself output.
::Right. And, or, I don't want to fall over and hurt myself, yes.
::And also, I'm focusing on making the movement pretty.
::Because there's an inverse relationship between how pretty you can make it look and how heavy it is.
::And so I just want to add in just one thing. I'm sorry to cut you off there.
::No, no, no. Go, go. So the other thing that happens, like if we were to,
::you know, we're talking about the wood chopper before and we're optimizing for
::load at one end by putting all the springs on, sitting on your heels and just,
::you know, yanking on that strap as hard as possible.
::And then at the other end, we're kind of kneeling up. We've got a light spring
::on. We're making it look balletic.
::We're keeping our shoulders down away from our ears and moving the,
::you know, ballet hands and all of the rest of it stuff.
::Right. So in the balletic version, you are going to,
::depending on how many reps you do and what spring you've got on, but for many people,
::you will feel a burn and get some kind of non-zero amount of strengthening in
::the deltoid, the upper shoulder of the arm that's away from the foot bar side arm, essentially,
::if you do enough reps.
::And so you may you know the other
::thing that happens is as you kind of increase the
::kind of control element of the movement and make it
::kind of more slow and light and balletic and
::focus on the nuances of which way your fingers are pointing and all that kind
::of stuff is you rather than like if you do a really heavy wood chopper sitting
::on your heels with all the springs on you're going to strengthen your obliques
::and your hips and your shoulders and your chest and your intercostals and all
::of these muscles are all contributing, probably your reductors and stuff as well.
::Whereas if you're doing the balletic version, you might get,
::you know, 90% of the strengthening you get will just be in your left deltoid.
::You know, so you're isolating the movement right down to like,
::you know, a tiny fraction of the muscle groups.
::And same, if you're doing like a side-lying leg springs on one spring,
::right, might be fantastic for the posterior fibers of your right gluteus medius, right?
::But the other 611 muscles in your body are doing basically fuck all,
::you know. So it's low value in terms of strengthening.
::So let me get you to unpack something for me and all the people that have asked
::me this question over the years, because I feel like it's something I could
::answer more comprehensively.
::In Pilates, there's a lot of, and I'm not sure where it comes from because it
::doesn't seem to be part of the original work, capital W, movements that are focusing on,
::all right, so if you, like me, for a long time, dear listener,
::think about movements as being for a muscle, right?
::Oh, so when we do this, it's for lower traps or it's for your pec minor or it's
::for your whatever. Well, Joseph's answer to that when people asked him in the
::studio, which muscle is this for, he used to get cranky and go, it's for the body.
::Yeah. Okay, great. Well, that might be the simple answer to my question.
::So when, you know, Raf's just given that example of the light spring,
::one hand in the strap makes steam come off your deltoid, but nothing else really feels anything.
::So maybe there's a non-zero strengthening effect for your deltoid.
::So if you're, like I saw for so long did, thinking that you're doing movements
::and you want people to feel a particular muscle so you know that that particular
::muscle is getting the effect, which you think is strengthening,
::whether it is or not, you don't know.
::So my question for you to unpack for us, Raph, is twofold. One,
::the things that we do for strength training are system-wide, right?
::So like squats, bench press, deadlifts, and in our case, let's say knee stretches
::on heavy springs, or there's multiple muscle groups working together as a system
::to create force against an external load.
::I would say there's a nuance to that.
::Yeah, that's what I want to unpack. All right. So you get, you are strong at a certain thing, right?
::Because strength is, the expression of strength is the ability to exert load
::against force, sorry, to exert force against an external object, right?
::Whether that's to move your own body weight or move the external object or whatever it is.
::And so there's a, there's a muscle contractile force component to that,
::and there's a skill component to that, right?
::So moving a barbell is not the same skill as.
::You know, moving a reformer carriage or doing a handstand, right?
::So doing an overhead press with a barbell is not the same skill as doing a handstand,
::even though it's the same muscle groups, right?
::So there's a muscle group component, and there's also a skill component to every test of strength.
::And so we could say, how long can you do a handstand for? And that might be one test of strength.
::And then how long can you hold this barbell overhead is a different test of strength.
::And they're not going to correlate a lot, right? Because if you've practiced
::holding a barbell overhead, that's going to make you better at doing that.
::You won't necessarily be able to hold a handstand for one second,
::and vice versa with practicing handstands. doesn't mean you can hold a barbell
::overhead, right? Even though you might have the same size shoulder muscles.
::So there's a skill component to everything.
::And so you can be strong at doing swakati.
::Right because that is there's a skill component and there's a muscle
::contraction component to it and you can be strong at
::doing barbell squat or a bench press right the the
::advantage and why i 100 agree
::with kind of the the the underpinning assumption between behind
::what you said is that like those big multi-limb compound movements like squats
::and bench presses and deadlifts and you know long stretches and lunges and things
::like that lunges push-ups push-ups all of those things are superior for developing
::strength is because you've got 612 or 620 or whatever.
::There's some, I think it's about 620, but there's a variable number because
::some people, there are some muscles that aren't present in every person, right?
::So some people have like 720 muscles in their body and some people have 610
::or whatever, but it's like, yeah, somewhere around that.
::You've got about 620 muscles in your body. If you targeted
::everyone individually and you did like 10 reps and
::then you did the other side for 10 reps and then you did three sets of
::that it'd take you like fucking 14 hours to do your whole body workout right
::so if we whereas if we just do like a
::lunge you've done freaking like 200 muscles literally
::right so you can just do all of
::the muscles in a much shorter time by doing bigger compound movements that
::involve multiple limbs right whereas if you're doing swakati great
::the right lateral the right lateral deltoids
::cooked now awesome now you've all you've got is your anterior and posterior
::deltoids on the right and then the left ones and then the other 615 muscles
::right and so it's like well how long is your pilates class you know that you're
::going to work with so there's nothing inherently less strengthening about doing
::an isolation movement like a swakati,
::compared to a lunge or push up or some other bigger compound movement but it's
::just like Like at the time mover level.
::Right. It's just way less efficient, way less efficient, time efficient.
::Yeah. So then-
::The next question that I often work through is, if you do that and you have,
::to quote, muscle imbalances, aren't you continuing to develop those muscle imbalances?
::So if you're, I don't know, if you're quad dominant, for Christ's sake,
::if you're quad dominant in knee extension- Well, I'm just going to stop you
::there because quad dominant is a total bullshit made up thing,
::which there's literally zero evidence for.
::I know, I know. It's just a made up thing. So, but this is the,
::I know, I know. But so this is the question.
::So for the, for the people who haven't got there, haven't understood this yet,
::or maybe they even understand the concept.
::I've often had the question, if I'm doing these big compound movements and focusing
::on force generation, am I not leaving some muscles behind? And so.
::No. Because you've said it's a, right. So unpack that. All right.
::So if, so dear listener, I've done a whole episode on this and presented like
::quite a significant amount of research in that episode.
::And I cannot for the life of me remember which episode it was,
::but I'm going to look it up.
::And the episode, drum roll, is 194, feeling a muscle working doesn't mean it's getting stronger.
::And then also 160, can we even feel muscles activating?
::So both of those, but I would say start with 160 if you want to get all the
::science on this topic of why feeling a muscle working and actually strengthening
::that muscle are just not the same thing.
::So that's not quite what I was asking. So in a compound, a big compound movement
::like a squat or a push up or a lunge or something like that,
::whether you can feel A, B or C muscle working has literally nothing to do with
::whether it is working and whether it's getting stronger, right?
::So just say you can't feel your glutes in a lunge. It's like,
::it doesn't fucking matter.
::They're going to get stronger, right? I guarantee. If you can do a lunge,
::it means your glutes are working. Like if your glute was paralyzed,
::you would not be able to do a lunge. So it's working, I promise you.
::So yes, a lunge is always going to strengthen your glutes and your quads and your adductors, yes.
::But if you're just doing just those big compound movements, there are certain
::muscles that you're going to miss out because those movements don't target things
::like hamstrings, for example, aren't going to get targeted in a lunge or a squat, right?
::And that's not because you can't feel it. It's not because you're working too
::hard. It's just because the biomechanics of that movement, it doesn't matter
::how light you make it, you're never going to fucking strengthen your hamstrings
::in a squat or a lunge because it's just not a good movement to strengthen that muscle in.
::If you want to strengthen your hamstrings, you have to do isolated knee flexion,
::or isolated hip extension, right?
::And yeah, so it's, but it's not about whether you can feel it or how much load there is.
::It's just about, it's just not biomechanically a good movement to challenge that muscle.
::And if you wanted to strengthen your lateral deltoid, the deltoid on the outside
::of your shoulder, well, is swakati a better movement than, say, push-ups?
::Yeah, it is, because push-ups doesn't really target the lateral deltoid, right?
::And you could do push-ups on the wall, right?
::The lightest possible push-ups, focusing 100% of your brain power on activating
::your lateral deltoid, it still wouldn't target your lateral deltoid,
::because it's just not a movement that loads the lateral deltoid, right?
::But and so swakati is a better movement for strengthening
::lateral deltoid than push-ups but not because push-ups is
::load it's just because like swakati is a better movement for
::strengthening lateral deltoid than lunges because lunges don't load the lateral
::deltoid you know it's like it's just not a that movement doesn't load that muscle
::right and and you've already answered it but i'm going to circle you back to
::it the the little movement so you know there's so much in Pilates choreography that,
::and in a lot of cases, it reflects gymnastics training where you do specific
::movements that do actually target a specific muscle.
::Right. Okay. So I'm just going to jump in there because you've totally inspired me with this thing.
::And I think that with that observation, so I just said there are certain movements.
::Just bi-mechanically load certain muscles, but not other muscles,
::right? And that's the case for any exercise.
::There's no one exercise that loads every single muscle in the body efficiently. but
::dear listener the distinction here is not between big muscles
::and small muscles it's not between
::big muscles and small muscles push-ups are like one-handed push-ups with your
::feet on the sofa highly highly loaded push-ups are fucking fantastic for loading
::the little muscles around your shoulder the rotator cuff there's like the number
::one exercise for loading in the rotator cuff.
::Heavy squats with a barbell with like your six rep max, so like,
::you know, one and a half times body weight probably, okay,
::are fantastic for your deep abdominal, you know, for your obliques and rectus
::abdominis, right, and your deep hip rotator.
::So the load isn't what determines whether the big muscles or little muscles are worth.
::It's just the biomechanics of does that movement actually load that muscle?
::And so squats are fantastic for your abs, They're shit for your hamstrings.
::Hamstrings are big muscle, right? Not a little muscle.
::Push-ups are fantastic for your rotator cuff, a little muscle. Terrible for your lats.
::Big muscle, right? So the distinction is not big versus little.
::It's just like where is that muscle situated and doesn't have a biomechanical
::moment to actually produce force in that movement, right?
::And in the case of lats in a push-up, no, it doesn't.
::Something i've wondered about with this is um
::all right so let's let's let's let's let's
::use a the hamstring as an example so
::as you've said in a compound movement uh the
::hamstrings are not changing length under load so it's not effective or as it's
::not as effective for strengthening the hamstrings as it could be right so if
::we want to strengthen the hamstrings effectively we want to move them through
::range of motion under appropriate load so we would need to fix one end of the
::the system so that the hip stays still or the knee stays still and you move at the other end. Right.
::So Jefferson curls or knee flexions. Or like a shoulder bridge on the reformer on a light spring.
::On a light spring, right? Which is effectively the same thing as a prone hamstring curl.
::Right. Or a front split on the reformer on a light spring.
::Fantastic. You're isolating the hip there.
::So the my question is if
::you're because i think this captures the question that
::i was trying to ask for the pilates world if
::i do appropriately loaded hamstring curls or jefferson curls and make my hamstring
::stronger will my overall output in a squat be higher no if i strength Does that make sense?
::Yeah, no. And that's the skill question, right? It's like- No, it won't.
::Yeah. Almost zero transfer. I would say, you know, I haven't seen a study like
::where they did hamstring curls and then did squats, but I would bet money that
::the transfer would be almost zero.
::Like you could spend six months in the gym doing 15 sets a week of hamstring
::curls to failure, you know, double the strength of your hamstrings.
::And at the end of it, your squat one RM would not have improved at all.
::If you didn't do other things as well, right? If you weren't squatting and whatever. Yeah. Yeah.
::And if you were doing the other things, it would be the other things that gave
::you the improvement in the squat. Whereas if you just squatted and didn't do
::a single hamstring exercise for the whole six months, you would get better at squatting.
::We're pretty far down the rabbit hole but can i ask you to think on something
::that i lived through and i've never been able to quite make sense of was it
::that acid experience you had in,
::we can talk about that another time on maybe a different podcast but uh no no
::this is um so on my 40th birthday so this is going back a while now i i'd been
::building up my deadlifts and my goal was to do lift 150 kilos on my,
::before my 40th birthday.
::And I got it. I got it on my 40th birthday. I lifted 150 and I needed to have a lie down, right?
::I was like, it was a one, it was a total one rep max. That was,
::that was all I was going to lift.
::And I literally did actually lie down afterwards on the ground next to my barbell
::because I couldn't really stand up.
::And I kind of thought, okay, well, I'm going to give myself a break from this
::for a while. I didn't even think that consciously. I just didn't want to do
::a deadlift again for a while.
::And there were other things in play that had already been
::emerging and so for the next few years all i did was gymnastic training
::i didn't do any barbell loaded work
::all i did was body weight work where if i used weights it was little
::kind of ancillary things but i
::was very systematic about it it's when i developed all the
::stuff around the diploma that we use for the good for everyone program
::and i was so super systematic i trained two to
::three times a week i'd vary my set output i'd
::bury my load input blah blah blah blah blah and got
::really strong and i was doing pistol squats and stuff that i'd never done before
::either and then i went to this event uh at
::a personal training studio that my girlfriend went to and they called it world
::deadlift day and it was just a little internal sort of thing it wasn't actually
::world deadlift and i went along i hadn't done a deadlift in the four years since
::my 40th birthday and so i assumed i'd do like 100 kilos.
::But i just was tracking along with the rest of the crew and i
::went to 130 140 150 and kept
::going and i got a one rm of 201 kilos and
::i was like i don't know where that came from like i haven't been training deadlifts
::i've got i've got never really i've got two two two things that i think explain
::that first one is uh so strength has a skill component but also just a muscle
::mass component right so two people equally skilled one with bigger muscles that
::person's going to be stronger, right?
::Or the same person, same amount of skill, four years go past,
::you've been training gymnastics, your muscles have got bigger,
::you're going to be stronger, right? Yeah.
::So bigger muscles are stronger muscles. So that's one thing.
::So that gymnastics training might not have developed your deadlifting skill
::at all, but it probably developed your glutes and your hamstrings and your back
::extensors and all of that stuff, right? And so just, yeah, more muscle mass, right?
::Is my guess. The second thing is the crowd.
::When you've got people watching, and we've got empirical research on this,
::people perform better when people are watching.
::Wow. Right? So I was trying to impress my girlfriend or whoever.
::Yeah, and all the other people there.
::And it's, you know, I mean, you could say that we're trying to impress the girlfriend,
::but it's also just like we get more stimulated, we get more,
::you know, fired up when there's other people around, right?
::We've got research saying, you know, when people get better results with personal
::trainers, not because personal trainers are better at programming,
::it's just because like they don't stop when it gets hard. The personal training makes you keep going.
::And so having that other person that just pushes you beyond what you thought you could do before.
::And so I would be a thousand percent certain that if you had continued deadlift
::training through that time, you would have hit like 250 on that day. Right.
::Right? Because of the skill component, et cetera. Right, right.
::But there was just, you've built muscle mass, awesome, and you already had the skill, right?
::And beyond a certain point, it's mostly the muscle mass. So like when powerlifters
::start out, they develop strength very quickly and out of proportion to the muscle.
::So how much muscle they get and how much strength they develop are not synchronized
::in the early, like you get really strong without putting on a lot of muscle.
::But then over years, to get stronger, like the only way to get stronger,
::if you've been powerlifting 10 years, muscle mass and strength correlate almost perfectly.
::Like how much you can lift and how much muscle mass you have correlate almost perfectly.
::So at the beginning, for the first X number of years, you're developing skill as well as muscle mass.
::But then at a certain point in the deadlift, your skill kind of maxes out, right?
::And there's not a lot more skill development available in that particular movement.
::But you can keep getting more and more and more and more muscle mass.
::So maybe you were relatively close to your maximum skill development,
::maybe not totally maxed out, but relatively close to it.
::And it's a relatively simple movement. So like four years later,
::it's like you hadn't forgotten that much about it. Still remember the fundamentals. Right?
::And you just developed more muscle mass and you had your girlfriend watching
::and maybe you were eating better or who knows, you'd slept better that,
::maybe had more coffees that day, I don't know.
::But there's lots of other variables that could explain it. Yeah, okay.
::Good talk. All right, well, let's wind that back to our- I'm sorry.
::I've got to wind it right all over there. Okay. Because here in Pilates Elephant's
::Land, it's dinner time, and I've got family coming over.
::Good talk. Thanks, mate.
::Music.