Podchaser Logo Rate on Podchaser

Episode 360

360. Nathan Ross Rees interviews Raph

This is my conversation with Nathan on his podcast, which you'll probably love if you like Pilates Elephants.

Nathan's podcast is her: https://open.spotify.com/show/24md12qTQmTIYULyzGXmzT

Mentioned in this episode:

Get 1:1 coaching with me to grow your studio



This podcast uses the following third-party services for analysis:

AdBarker - https://adbarker.com/privacy
Transcript
::

Welcome to another episode of Pilates Elephants. I'm Raphael Bender.

::

Today I have a special episode for you. This is a conversation I recently had

::

with Nathan Ross-Reese on his podcast, The Nathan Ross-Reese Reformer Podcast.

::

I highly recommend Nathan's podcast. If you like this podcast,

::

you're probably already a listener, but just in case you're not,

::

you should definitely check it out and I'll put a link in the show notes.

::

Anyway, without further ado, please enjoy my conversation with Nathan Ross-Reese.

::

Hi everyone, welcome to another episode of the Nathan Ross-Reese Reformer Podcast.

::

Today we've got Raf back again, the wise and wonderful Raf.

::

He's bringing the heavy artillery destroying dogma in the Pilates industry and

::

it's always a pleasure to have you on mate, thanks for coming back.

::

It's always a pleasure to talk with you Nathan. Thank you.

::

So I've been a massive fan of the posts I've been putting out lately,

::

loving the content loving the conversation with the camera and the evidence

::

that you're bringing to kind of.

::

Bring light to areas which have been kind of in the dark a

::

little bit just assumptions that we've all had that sound fine

::

that sound good but in reality this don't add up um

::

so i did a

::

little bit of a search back through probably the last two months of

::

your your content and some of

::

the topics today is almost like a highlight reel i'd like to kind of cover some

::

points and jump into a little bit more depth and nuance on

::

those um one of the

::

first ones i absolutely loved was when you're talking about

::

strength training and the extra nuance that we can kind of bring to it now um

::

obviously it's been a big buzzword in the community for a while and everyone's

::

kind of jumping on board and everyone seems to have a different interpretation

::

but to kind of get more of an insight onto how you see it um that's something

::

that i know that everyone listening,

::

is absolutely dying to learn more about so yeah well i think uh i mean i'm all

::

in favor of anybody who tries to help their clients get stronger. I think that's awesome.

::

And the reason I think that is awesome is because there's just a massive accumulation

::

of evidence in the scientific literature now that it just helps people live

::

better, healthier, longer lives.

::

And so of all of the things that you could sell in business.

::

Like longer, happier, healthier lives, it's like, there's not much,

::

it doesn't get much better than that. You know, this is like,

::

we're doing the Lord's work here. This is good stuff.

::

So I think it's fantastic that anybody, anybody out there who's trying to help

::

their clients get stronger, like go, you know, that's awesome.

::

Um, and so I think that probably the two big points, and you can sort of take

::

this where you want to take it from there is firstly, the, a new,

::

um, position stand came out from the American college of sports medicine,

::

uh, on resistance training this year.

::

And the last one was like five or six years old. So it's quite a, quite old.

::

And probably one of the biggest takeaways from this new position stand,

::

which is, and position stand is by the American College of Sports Medicine.

::

They get to get like a dozen people with PhDs in strength science and they read

::

through like a hundred systematic reviews.

::

And then they say, okay, so this is the state of current scientific knowledge

::

on this topic. Right. So this is like an exhaustive list kind of position stand.

::

And so probably the biggest takeaway is that the, from this stand is that the biggest benefit,

::

in terms of how much strength you gain, in terms of like health benefits,

::

like life extension and rejection of chronic disease, improved cognitive function, all that kind of stuff,

::

comes from when you go from doing nothing to doing a little bit.

::

So from that perspective, anything, the routine that you do is better than the

::

routine that you don't do.

::

Even if the routine that you do kind of is suboptimal and it's not perfectly

::

designed or whatever, it's like just doing something is way better than doing nothing.

::

So if you're out there badly training your clients, like high five because you're

::

training your clients and they're getting way more benefit than if you weren't

::

training them. So good on you.

::

So that's number one. And, and, but the second thing I think is that I think

::

in Pilates especially, but even in physical therapy, there's a lot of confusion

::

about what strength means and people use the word to mean different things.

::

Sometimes people use it to mean endurance. Sometimes they use it to mean power.

::

Sometimes they use it to mean strength in the, in the technical definition.

::

I think a lot of times in Pilates, we don't actually know what we mean when

::

we say the word strength. And so we say, oh, we're helping our clients get stronger.

::

But when, if I said, okay, what specifically, what does that mean?

::

A lot of people I don't think would be super clear on that.

::

And so I think that's where we get into all these debates about his Pilates

::

strength training or whatever.

::

It's like, well, first we have to just get clear on actually what it means to

::

help someone get stronger.

::

Yeah, so the challenge with this kind of conversation I've found personally

::

is almost like a lack of words to describe exactly what's happening.

::

So, you know, you say, okay, well, potentially what we're doing in the rep range

::

with like my method of reformer training is we're pushing like 30 plus reps,

::

you know, and then you would consider that potentially more endurance.

::

And then the outcome though is still over time clients can do the same duration

::

with more resistance um if heavy is harder or less support body weights the

::

load so there is like evidence there purely based on their performance that

::

they have improved physically,

::

and then you go to what is that is are they stronger now even though it's endurance

::

range you know is it strength so that's the the part that i always find that

::

i would appreciate a little bit more nuance on and how to describe it accurately

::

what the actual outcome is i mean is it just a bit increase in strength endurance but then it's.

::

Is that strength, you know what I mean? Yeah. So in, in the broad literature,

::

we would define strength as your ability to exert force against an external object.

::

So we measure like how heavy of a thing can you move or how much,

::

you don't even have to move. It could be isometric, but how much force can you

::

exert against an external object?

::

And that's very easy to measure. We measure it in newtons or kilograms.

::

And so that is just like the higher, the number of

::

newtons you can produce the stronger you are and so

::

that is strength but then within the

::

category of what the acsm would call muscle fitness which

::

broadly speaking kind of falls under the umbrella umbrella of

::

strength there's endurance which is how

::

long you can lift a submaximal amount for so how many

::

reps can you do at like three quarters of your maximum for

::

example then there's power which is like how

::

fast you can move something of moderate load then

::

there's speed how fast can you move something light so

::

there's all these different and then there's kind of like hybrid like

::

you know speed endurance and you know so there's

::

there's all of these kind of subcategories of muscle fitness

::

and broadly speaking in terms of there's

::

a lot of crossover and overlap between all of these

::

things uh and broadly speaking

::

any of them that you improve you're

::

going to accrue a lot of the health and

::

life extension benefits and a lot of the functional benefits you know so it's

::

not really to say that like pure strength is better than power or endurance

::

you know in terms of health or you know whatever so that's one thing is that

::

the benefits kind of cross over but obviously if you're sports specific,

::

like if you're a speed or power athlete,

::

then endurance is not going to be as good, you know, and vice versa, right.

::

If you're a marathon runner, you know, power is not very important. Yeah.

::

Um, so it becomes kind of sports specific depending on what outcome you're optimizing for. Um, but.

::

But in terms of like, there's also a lot of overlap between developing these, uh,

::

capacities at a basic level, by which I mean, if you're relatively new to resistance

::

training and you do any sort of resistance training, whether you're doing like a hundred reps,

::

you know, or two reps with a really, really heavy load or whatever in between,

::

you're going to develop all of, you're going to get faster and more powerful

::

and stronger and better endurance, like all of the above.

::

And if you just do keep doing that,

::

you will keep improving all of those attributes up to a certain point.

::

But then when you get to a certain level and you're sort of above,

::

you're already in the above average category at this point, you know,

::

if you want to maximize strength, well, you have to lift really heavy things to maximize strength.

::

But if you build up your endurance by doing 30 pushups or 30 lunges or whatever,

::

well, you're going to increase your muscle mass.

::

And ultimately that is going to increase strength. You're going to get stronger

::

by doing that, but you're just not going to get as much stronger as you would

::

if you lifted something very heavy, but you're going to get better endurance.

::

So you're sort of biasing it more towards endurance, but it's still,

::

you're still going to improve your strength.

::

And in one way, kind of endurance kind of falls under the umbrella of strength training anyway.

::

So in terms of like, what should we be doing with our clients? I think it's like.

::

Back to the ACSM point number one, the routine they stick to and enjoy is the

::

one that's going to give them the greatest benefit over the time because the

::

biggest benefit comes from doing nothing to doing something, right?

::

So if we just keep them coming back, like we already won 80% of the battle, right?

::

So we have to show them some kind of results over time in order for them to

::

achieve that, to look better, feel better, have more energy,

::

not have sore knees when they walk upstairs or be able to do all this exercise

::

they couldn't do before.

::

And so you can do that with endurance you can do with power you

::

can do with strength you know like there's no inherent benefit

::

to maximizing strength i

::

mean yeah i think when you try and maximize anything

::

it becomes a little bit obsessive and you

::

have to sacrifice other things in order to do it and for

::

some people like elite athletes that's a trade they're willing to make but

::

for most of our clients they just want to show up a couple of times a week get

::

a bit toned have more energy look good in jeans you know it's like it's anything's

::

good it's all going to work definitely have you ever played those games video

::

games back in the day where you had like a must have been like a character maybe

::

it was an athlete or like um.

::

On the game and it had like a list of attributes, you know, like speed,

::

strength, endurance, power, acceleration.

::

Yeah. I'd always love those games so much because I'd be trying to maximize

::

the hell out of every attribute. I want these guys to be the fastest,

::

strongest possible thing possible.

::

Yeah. And I feel like that's kind of the same approach to like training these

::

clients. It's like, I want them to be so fucking good, you know,

::

like, um, build them up in all the areas.

::

Well, you can get people, you can build people up in multiple areas up to a

::

point, but no one's ever going to win the gold medal in the marathon and the powerlifting.

::

In the same, you know, body because they, to a certain extent,

::

once you get to an elite level and for most people, you can improve endurance

::

and strength and power all at the same time.

::

But once you get to a certain level, like probably competitive level,

::

the more you maximize one, you actually have to decrease the other.

::

Like there's no marathon runners winning powerlifting competitions because the

::

sort of body that you need to win a marathon is kind of the opposite sort of

::

a body you need to win a powerlifting competition.

::

And so when you get really, really good at, to maximize your strength,

::

you have to put on a lot of muscle mass, right?

::

You, you, if you go and look at like someone winning a powerlifting or a weightlifting

::

competition, they've all got muscles, right?

::

And there's a very strong correlation.

::

There was a study a few years back where they looked at the Wilkes score of

::

elite powerlifters, which is basically just their pound for pound strength rating,

::

like it was irregardless of their, their body weight, it was like their,

::

their, their relative strength, relative to their body weight.

::

What they found was there was almost perfect correlation between the amount

::

of muscle mass, muscle mass and their Wook score.

::

And so what that says is that over time, you know, someone who's more muscular

::

is going to be stronger than someone who's less muscular.

::

So anything you do to increase muscle mass is going to increase strength over time.

::

And so you can't really kind of separate out those functionalities.

::

But if you wanted to become really, really like a speed athlete,

::

like if you look at elite mixed martial artists, right, they're not massively

::

muscled because all of that extra muscle mass actually slows you down.

::

There's more weight you have to move.

::

And so it actually hinders you. and it hinders

::

your endurance as well because you have to provide oxygen to all of that muscle mass

::

so but for most of our clients like i would

::

say 90 of our clients we can you

::

know increase all of their stats you know at the

::

same time but i think often in pilates i'm not necessarily talking about the

::

way you teach pilates nathan but the world at large we focus a lot more on moving

::

very slowly so we we eliminate the speed and power development which is really

::

important not just for athletes but But for everybody,

::

like if you have an elderly client,

::

their chance of falling and having a fracture is vastly decreased if they have

::

increased muscle power.

::

Because if you trip, which is how most falls occur...

::

You can catch yourself on your leg and explosively decelerate, right?

::

Like you catch yourself. That requires power, right? It requires speed and power.

::

And so even elderly people, not elite athletes, like everyone needs speed and

::

power. And speed and power are the things that decline the fastest.

::

Like we say we lose strength and muscle, but actually we lose speed and power

::

much more quickly as we age.

::

Everyone, you know, will know that elderly people aren't as fast. Yeah.

::

As younger people, right? Even more obviously, even the, even the,

::

the kind of fit muscular elderly people are slower than fit muscular younger people, you know?

::

And so speed and power is something we really need to work to preserve as we age.

::

And so I think there's a real need for moving fast in, you know,

::

with load in Pilates, you know? Yep. But I think we neglect that a lot.

::

Yeah, that's right. But, you know, if you talk about the purpose of training

::

to kind of prepare your body for the real world, like obviously you have to

::

move quick in the real world too.

::

Yeah. Yeah. And it's usually things that you're not anticipating.

::

So, you know, reacting to situations

::

like getting out of the way of like a vehicle you didn't see or, um,

::

yeah, an obstacle you didn't see or, you know, someone kind of running into

::

you and you have to kind of catch yourself, you know, all those moments that require you.

::

I think, um, yeah, to be ready.

::

So you have to have the body that's capable the.

::

The muscle mass thing, I think, could be like a really good way to minimize

::

the confusion because if the outcome of your training is you increase muscle

::

mass, then you get all the benefits of that, you know. Right.

::

And there are lots of research, like I said at the start, on the correlation

::

between strength training and longevity

::

and health and dementia and mental health, all that kind of stuff.

::

And so we can look at three things when we look at that.

::

We look at strength training volume, like how much strength training you do

::

on an average week look at muscle mass which is like a pretty

::

good correlation between if you do more strength training as long

::

as you're doing right you're likely to have more muscle mass over

::

time and then third thing is actual strength like how much can you lift right

::

and those three things are not exactly the same thing like you could do a lot

::

of strength training but do it very badly not put on a lot of muscle mass and

::

not get much stronger right or you could do strength training the way that say

::

Olympic weightlifters do it, which is very,

::

very low reps, staying away from failure,

::

focusing more on the explosive power actually is what they develop.

::

And so Olympic weightlifters, obviously they're much more muscular than the

::

average person, but they're much less muscular than the average bodybuilder.

::

And yet they can lift double or triple sometimes what a bodybuilder can lift.

::

So strength and muscularity are not exactly the same thing.

::

And so there's studies on looking at strength training volume,

::

the study's looking at muscle mass and the study's looking at strength as measured

::

by how much you can leg press or whatever.

::

And they all, all of those things correlate with improved lifespan,

::

improved health span, improved quality of life.

::

But of them all, strength, objectively measured strength, like how much can

::

you leg press, for example, how much can you squeeze on a hand dynamometer,

::

that has the highest correlation with strength.

::

Health, et cetera. So strength, muscle mass, resistance training volume.

::

But muscle mass has a pretty high color. It's not a very big difference between

::

muscle mass and strength.

::

So I would say, and muscle mass is the easiest thing to train for because you

::

can do 30 reps, you can do five reps, you get the same amount of muscle mass. Yep. Right. So yeah.

::

And plus that's what makes you look good. Yeah.

::

Yeah. Well, I suppose the body composition is just a ratio between body fat

::

and muscle mass. Right. Um.

::

And it's amazing how much more attractive everyone looks naturally when those

::

ratios change, you know, and you build the natural abilities that you already have, you know.

::

So I find that exciting that, you know, we could potentially simplify it down

::

to just increasing muscle mass because in these general populations,

::

anything you're going to do is going to basically do that.

::

Anything. And if you're doing 30 reps or even maybe 35,

::

40 reps, you know getting pretty close to

::

failure in that time you are going to

::

increase muscle mass exactly as much

::

as if you did five or ten reps like there's

::

literally no difference in the outcomes in terms of muscle mass and you're going

::

to get for the average person like way more strength than you probably even

::

thought you could develop you know just by doing that right and so we don't

::

need to maximize strength,

::

you know, and if you, you know,

::

realistically, if you truly want to maximize strength, you're going to run out

::

of options on the reformer fairly quickly because there's just not enough springs.

::

And even when you get to body weight, it's just, there's not enough body weight

::

to, you know, so I think you can, you can, you can bias for strength,

::

you know, as in like very high load,

::

relatively low reps, like under 10 reps, you know, to failure when someone's

::

relatively a beginner, because there's lots of stuff on the reform that's really hard for a beginner.

::

But as you get to be more experienced, you have to have been going like a year

::

or so pretty regularly and working pretty hard.

::

It's like, you're going to run out of springs, you know, so you have to start

::

increasing the reps or you have to add, add some big ass dumbbells at some point. Yep. Yeah.

::

Yeah. Yeah, I think the...

::

The systems that everyone kind of is creating to try and achieve these outcomes.

::

Like that's where the kind of diversity in the market offerings are because

::

everyone has a unique take on how to try and get to the same point.

::

I mean, I've definitely much different beliefs to a lot of people out there

::

about the best way to get to it.

::

Um, but that's the magic, you know, you can go out there and you can pick any

::

experience you want, you know, you can try them out and see what works for you.

::

Um, well, the main thing is the intensity, you know, And when I say intensity,

::

it means proximity to failure.

::

Like you need to get, to substantially improve muscle mass, you need to work

::

within like two or three reps of failure where you literally cannot do another

::

concentric, you know, rep. Yep.

::

And, you know, you'll get like a non-zero amount of muscle growth if you go

::

like five or six or seven reps from failure, but it'll be vastly less.

::

And if you go 10 reps from failure, you're basically just doing low intensity cardio. Yep.

::

Yep. Which is what most Pilates is. Yeah.

::

Especially, you know, if the spring doesn't change, you're doing some extended

::

flow. Two years later, it's still two springs on footwork. Yeah.

::

Yeah. Yeah. No change over time. Yeah, that's right. Yeah.

::

All right. So, um, I like it.

::

So you bring extra nuance to that topic about, you know, the improvements you can get.

::

Technically you are getting stronger, challenging the general population. Um,

::

I mean, if we just got everyone in the world, all adults to go to Pilates once

::

a week for 50 minutes and just do 30 reps to failure once on each muscle group,

::

like we would like massively reduce the burden of chronic disease.

::

We would extend people's lives by decades. like this would

::

be a major step forward for humanity you know so

::

forget optimizing the training we just get

::

them to show up and work hard that'd be amazing well

::

that's the i think um from other posts i've seen you

::

do um you went

::

through like a list of things which is kind of typical that a studio owner

::

or instructor might be posting you know posting on

::

the social media like hey you know i got a spot free wednesday

::

night but all you're doing is hitting the same market which is

::

already committed you're not kind of accessing the people that

::

haven't come yet and they're the ones that you really want to get to so um

::

so are you uh providing like

::

a training for people how to do paid marketing to kind of access to kind of

::

bring in new clients is that something that you've created um when i i've got

::

like at the moment like 22k followers on instagram when i do a post it varies

::

depending on who shares or whatever but typically i'll get like 1 000 people We'll see a post.

::

And so if you're a little Pilates studio and you've got like,

::

you know, 1200 followers or whatever, you do a post, I've got a free class on Wednesday night.

::

It's like 15 people are going to see that. And they're probably the people who

::

are already your clients anyway, who already like your post.

::

And that's why the algorithm shows it to them. Yeah.

::

So it's like, you're preaching to the choir. Yeah. You're like,

::

Hey mom, I've got a class on Wednesday and you want to come.

::

You're like, your mom's like, yeah, nah, I'm not coming.

::

So I just think social media as a

::

marketing tool for a local Pilates business

::

is not a great thing because you're limited

::

inherently by geography and whereas

::

for you and me nathan our market is

::

the whole english-speaking world right you're going

::

on a tour of the us the uk i've got most of my clients are outside of australia

::

uk and us predominantly bit of europe i've got a few in australia too but when

::

your market is the whole english-speaking world or at least the big five countries

::

australia canada us uk you know new zealand pretty much then yeah Instagram is a great place to,

::

to meet people and to introduce yourself to your market and stuff.

::

But when your market is like a five mile radius around, you know,

::

your studio, it's like that's, Instagram is not the best tool for that in,

::

like as an organic medium in most instances.

::

And also cause most studio owners like, like as you know, Nathan,

::

cause you've been doing it for years to grow an Instagram, like it doesn't mostly happen by accident.

::

You have to have a deliberate strategy like it's work it's a job that's right um and uh,

::

Most studio owners don't have a strategy and they're not that excited by posting

::

on Instagram and it shows. Yeah. You know?

::

And so to me, I just think it's basically a waste of time for most people.

::

I think Instagram is really good as a, just a source of social credibility.

::

Like if, if you look, found an ad for a studio or whatever, you probably go

::

and do your due diligence and check them out on Instagram and see if they're legit.

::

And if, you know, what, what it looks like. Yep.

::

That's what I do. Anytime someone applies for a job with me,

::

I'll check out their social media, et cetera.

::

Or if I'm talking to a potential new client, I'll check out their Instagram

::

and see what they're all about.

::

Yep. But I'm not going to find that employee or that client or whatever.

::

You know, I'm not going to find them on Instagram. They might find me on Instagram

::

because my market's the whole world.

::

But yeah, so in terms of paid ads, I don't run a course on paid ads. I do coaching.

::

I've got various programs I do with studio owners to coach them.

::

And one of the things i'd help people with is paid ads but i don't have a i

::

don't i mean we've got trainings inside actually i do have a training but it's

::

i don't sell it as a standalone training i share it just with people because

::

with people inside my program because.

::

I think the pilates industry is in a really really exciting place at the moment

::

is growing just unbelievably fast and the speed of growth is accelerating i

::

think and we're getting to a stage now, we're in a lot of places,

::

uh, Australia, a lot of parts of the US, some parts of the UK now,

::

it's becoming quite saturated.

::

Like I've got, I've got several clients in my mastermind where there's like

::

half a dozen Pilates studios within a four block radius, you know?

::

And so the.

::

2019 when you could just like open a

::

Pilates studio and put a sign out the front saying Pilates and

::

you know next day you're full you know those days aren't coming

::

back any you know anytime soon and so

::

you know what worked in in advertising three

::

years ago two years ago doesn't work now you

::

know so I think there is no kind of real cookie

::

cutter approach and I've got some clients like I said

::

in very high competition areas I've

::

got other clients opening up the first ever studio in some

::

rural town in nebraska or whatever it's like so

::

good yeah it's like great it's like put a put a

::

handwritten you know sign up in the local local supermarket

::

notice board and you're full the next day and so

::

i think there's a different strategy you know

::

for each studio of course there's overlap but i don't

::

think there is one kind of cookie cutter strategy but

::

i think one thing you have to know unless you just live in

::

a microscopic small town where everyone knows everyone you have

::

to learn how to run paid ads and it's

::

like you might fucking hate it it might be boring it's like all

::

that might be true but it's like well do you hate making money yeah do

::

you hate having clients you know like yeah yeah so it's a necessary um necessary

::

thing but the thing about it is if you are effective with it then it's like

::

it's like a tap you turn on and off, like when you need it. It's pretty cool.

::

I, um, you know, I post every day on Instagram. I think I've,

::

I don't think I've missed a day since three, four months, you know,

::

like I post, even those I don't feel like it, I still post.

::

Um, and I also run ads and I'll tell you what's easier.

::

Uh, so yeah, the ads are just, just, I mean, you want to reach twice as many

::

people, you just double the budget.

::

Yeah and then you got all the metrics all the data to look at and then you're optimizing yeah um,

::

Very good. Now, another thing I was really interested in is you're talking about

::

previously kind of held beliefs about loading the spine, you know,

::

being straight or in flexion and things like that.

::

And pretty much everyone, you could say, has like an aversion or a fear that,

::

you know, if you load the spine in a flex position, then you're going to be

::

doing some kind of damage.

::

But in the posts I've seen you do recently about that, that's completely the

::

other way around. Well, it's interesting.

::

Whenever I do a post on that topic, there's a couple of other topics that get

::

the same response, like spinal stabilization, like cueing the deep abdominals and stuff like that.

::

A couple of other topics, but this is one of the classics. I get comments,

::

like I did a post on this a couple of weeks back.

::

I think it's up at like several hundred comments already.

::

And the comments fall into three baskets.

::

Um and basket one is like yes amazing love this post you know thanks so much,

::

basket two is like this is bullshit no one says that like no one in pilates

::

is saying don't flex your spine i teach my clients to flex your spine you don't

::

even know pilates what the fuck are you doing go and learn pilates,

::

And then basket three is like, oh, this is so bullshit because neutral spine

::

is so important and we should never flex.

::

And so group two and group three are directly contradicting each other.

::

Cause one, group three is saying, yeah, you know, you should never flex.

::

And group two is saying like, no one says that.

::

But it's so interesting. And I get it with the core activation thing and spinal

::

stability and a couple of other things as well.

::

Pelvic tilt. I did one on pelvis. Oh yeah, I love that. You know,

::

no one did Pilates teach us pelvic tilt, you know, and then there's right under

::

that, there's a comment going, yes, pelvic tilt is so important, you know. Yeah.

::

So this is something very interesting to me because of my academic kind of background

::

in exercise science and physiology and stuff.

::

And just, I've just been really interested in biomechanics for a long time.

::

Um, and around the, the year 2000 and the kind of the, the decade after that,

::

I was very much into neutral spine.

::

I'd like every, I've got lots of photos of me teaching clients. I've got neutral spine.

::

I've got testimonials from clients who, you know, I saved like,

::

hallelujah, Jesus saved me, you know,

::

um, but I'm not saying I'm Jesus, but, um, but like I was saved this client

::

says by you know raf taught me neutral spine and now now i can walk again sort of thing um,

::

And I was basing that on kind of research that I was reading at the time.

::

But since then, there's been a lot more research come out that has basically

::

just, I guess, shown a more nuanced position.

::

So what we used to think, what I used to think, and what Pilates, I think,

::

still thinks, apart from the people who say Pilates doesn't think it,

::

is that there's something special about

::

neutral spine like it's somehow like safer or more

::

efficient or stronger or

::

somehow optimizes your ability to activate particular muscles

::

correctly or something like there's some kind of special thing about neutral it's

::

different to any other particular position you

::

know that's just not true like there's just like no evidence

::

for it you know it's just neutral is a

::

it's not even a position it's a zone and the

::

biomechanical definition of neutral is the

::

mid-range of any joint where the ligaments around

::

the joint are all lax right so ligaments of

::

bands of connective tissue that join bone to bone may say they attach you know

::

from one vertebra to the next vertebra in your spine and then you got them in

::

your elbow your fingers everywhere and there's ligaments on the back that as

::

you bend forward those ligaments get tight they stop you bending too far forward

::

like you don't want to bend like It's slinky.

::

You don't want to be like, you don't want to bend like 90 degrees at your L4-5, right?

::

So there's a ligament there to stop, to limit the range of motion. Yeah.

::

And there's a ligament on the front that stops you bending too far backwards.

::

One on the right that stops you bending too far to the left and so on and so forth.

::

So it just stops you from falling into a puddle on the floor and keeps you relatively

::

structured. Yeah. Right. Right.

::

And so as you bend forward, the ligaments on the back get tight.

::

And as you bend backward, the ligaments on the front get tight.

::

And when you're in the middle, neither of them are tight.

::

Right. And so there's about a 10, you know, roughly 10 degree range of motion

::

around the midpoint of the joint where none of the ligaments are tight.

::

Right. And that 10 degree range is called the neutral zone.

::

Right. And that is actually, interestingly, it's where there is the least stability

::

to the joint because all of the ligaments are lax.

::

Right. So it's the least ligamentous support in the neutral zone.

::

Now, does that mean it's dangerous? No, it's perfectly safe.

::

There's nothing wrong with neutral.

::

I just, it's not more stable. It's actually less stable mechanically. Yep. Right.

::

Um, so yeah, there's just nothing special about neutral.

::

Now there's nothing wrong with being in neutral, nothing wrong with teaching

::

people to be neutral. It's like fine.

::

It's nothing wrong with it at all.

::

There's nothing special about it either. And I just think there's no particular

::

reason to teach. Why would we teach someone?

::

I mean, why would I teach someone 17 degrees of flexion? It just seems like

::

a random thing to teach people. Yeah. There's nothing wrong with it, right?

::

But it's like, well, why do we teach them zero degrees of flexion?

::

What's special about that? Yep. You know?

::

And we have interesting literature in several areas.

::

So the reason that we think neutral or we thought neutral was,

::

you know, better, we thought it was safer.

::

We thought it was more stable. We talk about the stability thing.

::

It's actually less stable.

::

From a purely biomechanical standpoint, we thought it was strongest.

::

Um we thought it was most efficient okay so

::

when we look at the those in order like all of those are not true

::

we'll look at the pain thing right so neutral protection

::

against injuries or pain it's like no there's no evidence that people with sore

::

backs have worse posture in fact people there's the opposite people with sore

::

backs tend to stay straighter when they lift if you look at somebody imagine

::

somebody with a really sore back

::

imagine doing up their shoes what do you imagine them bending like a cat.

::

No, you imagine like staying stiff like a board and kind of like bracing and

::

like, you know, getting down on one knee.

::

So people with sore backs actually move with more rigid, neutral spines.

::

People with no back pain, they're going to slump and slouch and bend,

::

you know, it's like a normal person.

::

We look at the strength thing, actually, as you bend forward,

::

there's very good biomechanical literature and cadavers on this and also in actual living people.

::

This is a pretty clear biomechanical finding. As you bend forward,

::

uh, and then you got to pick something up, like you pick up something heavy off the floor.

::

Uh, if you do it with a rounded back.

::

Your ligaments on the posterior side, the back side of your vertebrae,

::

and also all the fascia sheets back there, become tight, right?

::

And it turns out that ligaments are way stronger than muscles, right? Yep.

::

And so you actually can produce more force when you flex because you actually

::

tighten up those ligaments and they, it's like pulling on a steel cable as opposed

::

to like a flex band, which would be the muscle, the contractile tissue.

::

And so at around 90% of your maximum spinal flexion,

::

you are substantially stronger, as in you can deadlift more than in a neutral

::

spine where you're just using the muscle force because the spine is much less

::

stable because you're not tightening those ligaments.

::

Yep. So it's more efficient, requires less effort. I mean, you can think about this as well.

::

All right, so imagine you have to pick up a coffee cup or a pen off the floor, right?

::

Imagine you have to keep your spine neutral to do that. So you stand up tall,

::

you're neutral, get your hips under your shoulders, you bring your ribs in,

::

everything's perfect. Okay, now lock that in, brace it in that position,

::

keep your spine neutral, pick up the pen.

::

Okay, that's going to require a lot of effort. Yeah. Right? Whereas if I just

::

said like, hey, just bend over like a normal person, pick up the pen, way easier, right?

::

So it's more efficient. Now, the definition of efficiency is how much input

::

versus how much output, right? If it's more effort to do the same task,

::

it's less efficient. That's what efficiency is, right?

::

So neutral spine is not safer.

::

There's no evidence that people who bend when they lift or whatever get more

::

back injuries or anything like that, it's not associated with less pain.

::

In fact, it's associated with more pain.

::

I don't think that's what causes the pain, but I think it's part of the cycle.

::

It's not stronger. It's not more efficient. It's not more stable.

::

Now, it's not bad. There's nothing wrong with neutral, right?

::

It's like, what's all the fuss about? Yep. Yep.

::

Yeah. Wow. There you go. That's awesome. I love it.

::

And I know that you're talking about there's natural variation in like –,

::

structure of people's hips and then trying to use those points to determine

::

like that to me because obviously the body is not symmetrical the body is like

::

highly asymmetrical and then that's just in in one body and then you look at

::

your variations between all the humans and I mean,

::

it's incredible the differences between all of us anyway the idea that everyone

::

would have the same points on their hips to kind of better find these things

::

I mean you think about it's laughable really. It is.

::

And I don't, well, it's laughable when you contrast it, because I think it's

::

one of those things that's not immediately obvious.

::

It's not obvious until you kind of see it. And then it's like,

::

oh yeah, how could I have not seen that? But before you see it, it's not obvious.

::

And so I was always under the impression for years and years that that skeletal

::

structure is kind of like this immutable structure.

::

Thing. Like if you have a structural scoliosis, like a sideways curvature of

::

the spine, it's not something you can just fix with exercise or whatever.

::

Or if you've got a leg length difference is because one femur,

::

one thigh bone is longer than the other.

::

It's like, there's no exercise that's going to fix that. So it's kind of immutable in that sense.

::

And so it's like, okay, well, if your bone is higher, that's got to mean that

::

your pelvis is in the wrong spot, you know?

::

So it kind of made sense to me for a long time. But now the more

::

I've thought about it and I've read the research obviously now showing

::

that we do have different shaped pelvises and different shaped femurs

::

and different shaped hip sockets whatever it's like i

::

think about it and i think about like way back in the early 20th

::

century when we had this kind of what was it called um eugenics or something

::

where we'd measure someone's like head circumference and go oh yeah you must

::

be dumb because your head circumference is this you know or it's like the distance

::

between people's eyes would indicate how trustworthy they were or you know that

::

kind of like crazy what we'd now think I was just ridiculous,

::

you know, who, what idiot would believe that? Yeah.

::

Oh, Nathan's head is X number of centimeters. Therefore his IQ must be this much. Yeah.

::

Um, uh, and it's like, well, we're just literally doing the exact same thing

::

with your pelvis. Oh, your bones at this point.

::

Therefore you've got this muscle balance. It's like, well, no,

::

it's like, are people's heads different shapes? Yes. Are their eyes different distances apart?

::

Are their ears different heights? Are their cheekbones different?

::

You know, of course. Yeah. Of course they are. So why would their pelvises all

::

be identical? Yeah. You know?

::

Yeah, it's just, I mean, look, look, any, any people, dear listener that you

::

know in your life, right?

::

Loved ones, family, whatever. Like put your hand next to their hand, right?

::

They have different length fingers, different width of your palm,

::

different circumference of your finger.

::

Like some people's fingers are more straight. Some people's are more wavy.

::

Sometimes the middle finger is a bit longer. Sometimes the first finger is a

::

little bit like people's hands are very different, right?

::

Why would their pelvises be all identical?

::

Look at people's feet. Why do we have like 10 different shoe sizes available

::

and different widths of shoes?

::

Why do we have like regular suit jackets and then tall suit jackets?

::

People have different length spines.

::

It's like the evidence is just everywhere that people are different sizes and shapes.

::

And if you think if you've got someone who's six foot four, 300 pounds and someone

::

who's like five foot one, 125 pounds, we think of those two people who died.

::

We looked at their skeletons, they would look the same. You know?

::

I don't think they would. No. Right? No. So, so it just seems ludicrous the more you think about it.

::

Yeah. That if we go, oh, your bony landmark is here and your bony landmark is

::

there, therefore you're, this one's wrong, you know, and this one's correct.

::

It's just, it's just a meaningless exercise. Yeah.

::

Yeah. And the science backs that up, that when we, scientists,

::

we get, you know, like the, the,

::

And I hope your listeners will forgive me here just to go into slight digression,

::

or not digression, but just like nerd out here for a second on the anatomy, is that neutral pelvis,

::

okay, as we're taught in the Pilates land, which came from Kendall et al.

::

Muscles Testing and Function with Posture and Pain, which was first published

::

in I think 1947 or 49 or way back mid-20th century.

::

They defined neutral pelvis as when the ASIS, the front pochiated bit on the

::

front of the hip bones, and the symphysis pubis were aligned vertically, right?

::

So symphysis pubis and your ASIS are directly in line, like neither one is in

::

front or behind the other.

::

That's neutral. And the idea was that when you are in neutral,

::

then the PSIS, the pochiated bit at the back of your pelvis next to the sacroiliac

::

joint, would be at the same height as the ASIS.

::

Now, when I was taught in Stott Pilates, I was taught on a female,

::

it should be one to two centimeters higher and on a male, it should be level in neutral.

::

Turns out that's not true. But when scientists actually get cadaver pelvises

::

and they put them in a jig, that puts them in a perfect neutral with the ASIS

::

and the symphysis pubis perfectly aligned. Okay.

::

And they measure the height of the PSIS.

::

They find there's a massive variation of up to 23 degrees in how high the PSIS,

::

when all of those pelvises are in a textbook neutral with the symphysis pubis

::

lined up with the ASIS, right?

::

And they also find differences up to like 11 millimeters in the heights of the iliac crests.

::

Even when the pelvis, like the ASIS is perfectly level, okay,

::

they'll have one iliac crest higher.

::

So the test I was taught, a lot of us were taught, you know,

::

you feel the iliac crest, oh, this one's higher, therefore your pelvis is hiked

::

on the left side or the right side or whatever it might be.

::

Maybe that size of the pelvis is just bigger. Like, has anyone ever got like

::

one ear bigger than the other one foot bigger than the other one hand bigger than the other?

::

Like, you know, it was like, of course, one eye bigger than the other.

::

Like we all have these weird asymmetries all over our body, right?

::

It's like, why would the pelvis be different? You know, like there's other,

::

the average person, can't remember what was left or the right ASIS,

::

10 degrees forward of the left ASIS, just structurally, like it's actually a

::

pokey or out of your bone, you know?

::

And, and so when you're palpating, oh, this side's a bit further forward.

::

So your pelvis is rotated.

::

Probably not. It's probably just, that's just the shape of the bones.

::

You know, just feeling their normal variation in their human shape, you know?

::

So yeah, anyway, it's just normal variation and we pathologize it. And, um.

::

You know, another study that, uh, I really love, they, they,

::

they looked at 120 pain-free people and, um,

::

measured the pelvic alignment and they found 75% of women and 85% of men had

::

an anterior pelvic tilt. Right.

::

And it's like, all right, well, so if 80% of people, pain-free people,

::

80% of pain-free people have it.

::

Is it a tilt or is it just, that's a normal shape of the pelvis?

::

80% of people are above average.

::

Yeah. Yeah.

::

Yeah, just sit with that for a moment. You know what I mean? It's crazy, isn't it?

::

Because that's the pervasive language. That's the standard speak out there,

::

you know, the standard kind of thought processes.

::

But when you take just a little bit of a look into it, it just doesn't make sense at all.

::

Well, I think in Pilates, and like there are so many other disciplines in which

::

people do this. I think physiotherapy did this for years.

::

You know, other disciplines, osteopathy, chiropractics, classic for it,

::

massage, naturopathy, you know, so many disciplines do this.

::

I think it's almost universal.

::

I think let's just say humans do it. Yeah. Is we, we make up dysfunctions that

::

we can then fix with our special method.

::

Yeah. Yeah. And, and so we, we gift somebody, you know, oh, congratulations.

::

You've got anterior pelvic tilt or your spine's unstable or what you've got

::

a hyperlordosis or your glutes don't fire properly or whatever.

::

Oh, don't worry. We can fix it.

::

If you just come twice a week for the next five years. Yeah.

::

But it's like, the thing is though, we don't need to make up these bullshit

::

fairytale, you know, things that don't exist.

::

We can just help people get stronger. Like we have a genuine thing that we can

::

help people with, which is to fucking live longer. Yeah.

::

Like there's nothing finer that you can gift somebody in my opinion.

::

So it's like, we don't need to make up stupid, you know, make believe,

::

you know, pathologies like anterior pelvic tilt or glutes not firing properly.

::

Like when just, when there's a genuine pathology, which is people aren't exercising

::

enough. They're not strong. They're not confident in their bodies.

::

We can, we can fix that. We actually can fix it. It's a real thing and we can

::

actually fix it. So let's just do that. Yeah. Let's just do that really well. Yeah.

::

Yeah. No, no, it's awesome. That's awesome. It's really refreshing.

::

It's almost like when you kind of look at these things in more detail,

::

it's almost like a bushfire and it just burns everything away and it's like

::

rejuvenating, like the freshness that comes out of it, the new openness,

::

the new focus on actually what is important, you know?

::

Because it's so easy to get bogged down in all these kind of like things because

::

it's all like second person, third person information bouncing around.

::

You've got people debating it without ever having read any literature themselves.

::

Because someone else said it and someone else said it.

::

And that was me like 15 years ago, you know?

::

And so no shade on anyone out there. If you've, if that's what you currently

::

believe or have believed or whatever, it's like, yeah, we've all been there

::

and you have to trust people.

::

You know, when I went to Pilates certification, that's what I was taught.

::

I was like, why wouldn't I believe that these people are the teachers?

::

They've got a textbook and it seemed legit.

::

And I think they genuinely believed what they were teaching me.

::

They just didn't know any better, which is a bit shameful really,

::

because as an educator, I think it is incumbent. I think you actually have an

::

obligation to actually fact check and learn what you're teaching if it actually is true.

::

But I think it reminds me of that meme, the sort of like the idiot savant meme,

::

sort of like, you know, there's the village idiot who's got this very simplistic

::

view of like, oh, why don't we just help people get stronger, you know?

::

And then there's this like journeyman who's like, you know, knows a little bit

::

and they're like, oh no, we've got to fix their anterior pelvic tilt and correct

::

their muscle activation and their pelvic and their lordosis and their,

::

you know, tibial torsion and their blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.

::

And then there's the Jedi master who's like, hmm, why don't we help people get stronger?

::

Yeah. Yeah. I can see why these ideas, they can be kind of.

::

It's kind of like this, they sound technical enough to be true.

::

So it's easier to believe because it feels like it has credibility.

::

And then if it comes from a credible source, you think, well,

::

it must be, you know, why else would they be talking about it if it wasn't important?

::

Yeah. And I 100% agree with that.

::

And I think the thing is with credible sources, you shouldn't,

::

you know, dear listener, you shouldn't trust anyone.

::

You shouldn't trust me. like in this episode, I haven't cited any specific research papers.

::

And so don't take what I say here as gospel.

::

Uh, if you want to, uh,

::

you know, look at one of the 350 plus episodes of my podcast where I've talked

::

about these topics repeatedly. And I do have a crap ton of scientific citations

::

on each of those episodes.

::

And so it doesn't matter who says it, I think you should always look for,

::

if someone's making a claim about something about exercise science or strength

::

or pelvic tilt or pain or stability,

::

they should have, you should, it should be a totally normal thing to ask them,

::

well, well, how do you know that?

::

You know, how do you know that's true? Because I've known lots of things that

::

were true that turned out to be not true.

::

And so you have to be able to ask that question. And I think it's a massive

::

red flag if someone doesn't want you to ask that question.

::

How do you know that? Yep. That's right. Yep.

::

Now, just before we came on air today, I was talking to Raph about one of his posts.

::

He was saying that it seems like a common practice that new instructors get

::

overloaded by trying to learn how to do everything.

::

They're trying to do like a hundred things, but not doing any of them very well.

::

And i think that reminds me

::

of that uh must have been a quote from bruce lee maybe like don't fear the guy

::

who does has done 10 000 kicks fear the guy's done one kick 10 000 times i thought

::

it was so funny because that is the same philosophy i've got when it comes to

::

like training a new trainer um so rather like i'll do like a general,

::

kind of workshop induction about like the loading principles

::

and about the philosophy and some of

::

the methods like the teaching method but as soon as that's done which takes about less

::

than an hour then we just focus on teaching one exercise we do it like 10 or

::

15 times and we do it right before a practice teaching session and then they

::

just teach that exercise three four classes in a row and then next week we do

::

same process again just add another exercise until eventually they're doing the whole warm-up,

::

then doing third of the class, half the class.

::

And then, so you get that contact time and you get the reps in.

::

And it's very like, if you look at the time you practiced it versus the time

::

you get to use it, it's literally, we did it like eight times in a row and now

::

you're teaching it right now. So that...

::

That post you have on that, I just could not agree more with that because it

::

just is very, very effective at skill acquisition because you're just getting

::

to action everything straight away.

::

Yeah. Yeah. I think there's no, it's not a coincidence that you like that because

::

I think it's just that reflects a reality about how humans learn.

::

You know, it's like no one is going to learn better by trying to memorize a

::

thousand things at the same time. Like it doesn't, that's not how a human brain works.

::

So anybody who's taught a lot and experimented with different methods of,

::

you know, speeds of progression and different ways of training people,

::

eventually you have to figure this out.

::

You know, it's better when you drip feed things to people and let them get them

::

doing a lot of reps of something very basic and then get them to implement that

::

and then keep cycling on that until they nailed it. And then you move on to

::

the next thing, you know?

::

And if you read the scientific literature that's what

::

it says as well but it's like that's the scientific literature is just

::

literally people did trial and error experiments and figured out what

::

worked and that was it you know but i

::

think that in pilates we we mistake often breadth for depth and we think like

::

okay if you know 500 exercises and you're comprehensively trained that makes

::

you a good instructor it's like

::

well knowing an exercise is not a binary it's not like a zero or a one,

::

you either don't know it or you do it. And it's like, well, how well do you know it? You know?

::

Okay. You can do it, but can you cue it?

::

Can you cue it to someone who doesn't know those anatomical terms?

::

Can you cue it to someone who's never been on a reformer before?

::

What do you do if someone can't do it on the spring setting that you gave it?

::

You know, how do you know what, do you know what that looks like?

::

You know, and how many more springs do you take off or add on based on what you see?

::

And like all of these things are things that it just takes time to learn, you know?

::

And I think the example I use in a podcast recently with Heath was my daughter's

::

been, she's 19 and she's been, become sort of mildly obsessed with baking sourdough bread.

::

Oh, nice. And so she watched a couple of TikTok videos, learned how to make

::

sourdough starter and just did it all myself.

::

And the first couple of loaves, you know, it didn't turn out perfect, but they were edible.

::

And then after, you know, three or four loaves, she started to get the hang

::

of it, but then she sort of started to overcorrect and then she undercorrected

::

and then she, you know, and so after her like 20th or 30th loaf,

::

it's now like perfect every time. Yep.

::

But you just have to go on that journey of reps, you know, to encounter those

::

kinds of weird situations where like it was a little bit different,

::

you know, the fridge was a different temperature or the humidity was different

::

that day or the whatever.

::

And you just have to learn how to incorporate all

::

of those little variations into the way that you use a

::

skill and that you just have to do reps like

::

there's no substitute for reps in in learning and if you're learning 500 things

::

you do one rep of each thing it's like you don't get enough air time that's

::

the bruce lee thing right you just you need more reps and so i think it's kind

::

of backwards the way people in Pilates broadly,

::

you know, view quality.

::

They say, oh, you know, we, all our instructors are comprehensively certified

::

with 500 hours of training.

::

It's like, yeah, but what did they do in those 500 hours?

::

You know, like if they spent 500 hours and they need to teach footwork,

::

I'd be like, fuck, I bet this person is really good.

::

But if they've learned 500 exercises and spent one hour on each of them,

::

including learning how to do it themselves, I'd be like, yeah,

::

they probably know nothing.

::

Yeah. Because there's no way they remember them all.

::

Yeah. Like if you get to number 500, there's no way you remember number one or number 17.

::

Yep. Right. So I think, you know, simply listing all of the things that you've

::

supposedly in quotes learned is, it's not only kind of misses the point,

::

I think it's kind of flips the point.

::

It's like literally the more breadth you learn, the less depth you can learn.

::

Because we've only got so much capacity.

::

And so if my daughter had done one loaf of sourdough, then done a salad,

::

then done a chicken Kiev, then, you know, practice flambé and crepe Suzette's,

::

it was like, she would be shit at all of those things, you know?

::

Whereas she's done like 50, 60 loaves of sourdough now. She's really fucking

::

good. She could sell it. Yeah.

::

You know, she could sell it. And it's like, every time she puts a loaf in the

::

oven, I know it's going to turn out exactly perfect.

::

And she brought two loaves out the other day and she was like,

::

oh, which one do you think is the good one?

::

I'm like, they're both perfect. like she's like no this one's better i'm like

::

yeah they both look fucking perfect to me like and so she's now at the point

::

where it's like you know this one's like a quarter of a percent better in her

::

mind because of something that's like dude they're both like top one percent awesome.

::

That's the that's what comes from just lots of

::

reps with introspection and feedback and looking at

::

tiktok and going oh mine doesn't look like hers you know and then why is

::

why did it turn out this way and then just trying to figure it all

::

out and getting really good at doing a narrow range of things

::

and then she can start to branch out and add in she did

::

a fruit and nut loaf and the first one kind of sucked because it

::

made it too heavy and it didn't rise at the right but then she figured out oh

::

if i use these different fruit and nuts and i fold it in this different way

::

and i put it on this different temperature it's like after five or six attempts

::

she's nailed it right and then she's like oh what if i made crackers and what

::

if i you know and so now she's done a chocolate loaf and she's done all these

::

kinds of different layers. Yeah, that's cool.

::

And that just comes, that's the equivalent in Pilates of if we're teaching footwork

::

and now we've come across someone,

::

oh, someone had a knee replacement or someone had a sore back or someone had

::

never done Pilates before or somebody, you know, was really strong and had been

::

squatting double their body weight at the gym or, you know, like now we've faced

::

all of those situations.

::

We've figured out how to solve each of those.

::

And now somebody else comes in we've never seen before. It's like we've seen every other darn thing.

::

So we can just figure it out on the fly because there's nothing can surprise

::

us at this point. We've just done the reps, you know, but I said to my daughter,

::

Hey, do a loaf with cinnamon and apple.

::

She'd be like, yeah, you know, bam, probably turned out perfect first time.

::

Cause she's done enough reps now. She just knows.

::

She knows what it's meant to look like, feel like, smell like, taste like. Yep. Yeah.

::

And that's where the confidence comes from because you've got the experience

::

to back it up and then you can predict, you'd be able to kind of anticipate

::

and predict success in the future based on what you've done in the past.

::

So you're walking into environments where there's like not many things that

::

you wouldn't be aware of that you wouldn't be able to handle.

::

So maybe one of the reasons why new instructors feel a little bit stressed is

::

because they're trying to learn 500 things and not, not, not doing anything

::

well, you know, just take it, strip it right back to the, what's the one,

::

because you can only teach one exercise at a time, right?

::

That's why I always get, I always get the fires of me up.

::

It's like, there's no, there's no point getting fancy with stuff. You know what I mean?

::

Like it's, to being a great teacher isn't really about knowing all these exercises.

::

It's about how well are the clients doing the exercise you gave them.

::

That's what makes you good. So being fucking awesome at teaching the fundamental basic exercises,

::

sets them up to be able to do everything else so if you can't teach them how

::

to do a lunge or a chest press or a plank then

::

that's the fucking problem because that's the thing they have to be good at

::

first it's like the prerequisite to every other exercise it's like you

::

unlock exercises based on building the core attributes

::

to better handle the different variations so when i'm

::

teaching an instructor i'll be getting them to look at all

::

right they've just given the movement cue everyone's moving i'd stand

::

there on the side of the room with them at a vantage point about like all right

::

cool how many people are moving exactly the way you intended so we're looking

::

at speed of movement range of motion body position springs and coordination

::

is everything exactly the way you wanted and you might go okay we're doing footwork

::

he said you want to toes in the bar but see there's three people with the heels in the bar.

::

So they pre-cure that, you know, they're like, okay, cool. So they're already

::

starting to get the feedback loop from the environment.

::

And they know that if we've got 18 people in the room, 18 out of 18 have to

::

get it before you do anything else. There's no point.

::

So that's kind of like internal metric. And you want that to be internalized

::

within them because that means you're building autonomy and they're going to

::

be awesome when you're not there.

::

Yeah. Well, that's exactly the way we teach as well. The first thing is you've

::

got to just say the words to get people into the position.

::

Second thing is you got to look and say, like, are they actually doing,

::

you know, what I ask them to do, like are the heels or toes or whatever it might be.

::

The third thing is that we teach, and I'm pretty sure you teach some version

::

of this as well, is like, well, are they at the right level of challenge?

::

Does this person need an extra spring? Does this person need to move faster

::

or smaller range of motion or whatever? Do we need to put foot bar down for this person?

::

And then the fifth thing, or the next thing, I've got what number we're up to,

::

but the next thing is we progress it.

::

So everybody's there, everybody's with it, everybody's working. Great. Next level.

::

Yep. Um, and I think where we, I think we often confuse this and I,

::

I certainly made this mistake as a relatively young instructor is we feel like

::

we need to entertain the clients by giving this constant stream of novelty in

::

the exercise selection.

::

But we're actually like as a lifelong exerciser and dear listener,

::

you're probably in this basket as well.

::

If you love Pilates, you probably do a lot of Pilates and you probably do a

::

lot of exercise and running and weights or whatever you do.

::

It's like the joy in the activity people. and there's research on this as well

::

in terms of behavior change, people usually start an activity for extrinsic reasons.

::

So they want to lose weight, they want to look better, they want to fit into

::

their dress or they fit it into high school or whatever it is.

::

But that doesn't keep you going five years later.

::

People keep going five years later because the intrinsic joy of the activity, it feels good to do it.

::

Just regardless of the result you get, it's just you like doing it and it becomes

::

inherently rewarding to do it well.

::

Anybody got good at anything is because you.

::

You've found an inherent reward in improving it at doing that thing.

::

Like it just feels like there's no, it's not good because it just is good. Right. That's the end.

::

And so when you exercise and you get stronger, that is inherently rewarding.

::

Right. If you can do six pushups and last week you get under do five,

::

like that is not fucking boring.

::

That is really fucking exciting. Like people get really excited about that.

::

And when you get to the, when you do 30 pushups and 40 pushups, it's like.

::

Fuck yeah, I'm like a super being now you know and and

::

so like i think we we don't give

::

people credit our clients credit for like

::

people can be very motivated by

::

very simple routines as long as they're progressing

::

as long as they're getting better at doing the thing you

::

don't need a lot of variety most of the time yep yep and

::

the part of that is the education of like them understanding how they're improving

::

like if they're doing the same exercise in a different spring setting

::

which is technically harder a lot of the times they wouldn't

::

understand why is like the lightest spring harder in

::

this exercise why is the heaviest spring harder you know

::

it's based on the loading you know like if we change the

::

body position to stretch the spring more why is that harder you know

::

so being able to kind of say all right everyone who wants an extra challenge

::

yep everyone's like no like yes let's go all right everyone if you're next to

::

challenge next time you push your arms straight let's lift the hips you know

::

and the reason that's harder is you stretch the springs more it gives you more

::

resistance so um so then okay cool so it's not just do this.

::

Okay this this context like if you do

::

it this will happen and then there's also why is it harder

::

so you do that enough

::

all the clients like know just know everything so by the time you're teaching

::

like a intermediate slash advanced class they pretty much have almost like an

::

instructor level understanding and they also means they know how to cheat so

::

then you have to like watch that be like hey where are your feet over there

::

you know um but it brings a lot of joy because you're focusing on such small details, you know?

::

Yeah. I think it's funny that the, the, like you say, the small details.

::

Like when you understand the relationships between the equipment settings,

::

you know, your football setting, how far you're pulling the ropes,

::

where your foot is on the carriage, whatever, spring choices and the load, right?

::

And how you can manipulate all of those different things to apply more or less

::

load in very, very fine increments to somebody.

::

Like you say, when you lift up to your knees in a, in a chest press or,

::

um, you know, arms in straps facing the foot bar, like why is that harder?

::

Well, there's a balance challenge. Obviously you've got a smaller base of support

::

and a longer lever, but predominantly, like you say, you're higher up.

::

So you're pulling the ropes further, which stretches the springs further,

::

which increases resistance on the spring. So it's harder on your shoulder muscles.

::

It's not just harder on your balance and your core. I mean, you know,

::

all of this back to front, But, but when you understand that as an instructor,

::

like small little details, like move your foot two inches forwards or drop your

::

foot bar one rung or whatever.

::

Come up to kneeling, you know, can make a massive difference to the client's level of challenge.

::

And that's where, even though we're not focusing, hopefully,

::

on anterior pelvic tilt or muscle activation or your lordotic curve or whatever,

::

small little details in alignment and equipment setting and positioning do make

::

a big difference. And it is important to focus on these things.

::

And so what I'm advocating, and I know what you're advocating,

::

Nathan, is not just like free for all, no one gives a fuck about alignment or whatever.

::

Us like that's couldn't be further from the truth but it's

::

like we're trying to set people up in their body

::

position their equipment settings etc to maximize load

::

on the body part we're trying to load within the

::

client's capacity so that they're right at the level of their right at the limit

::

of their current level of ability and that requires an under a deep understanding

::

of how the equipment functions their body mass their height how they relates

::

to it and looking at their technique to be able to figure out,

::

okay, is this easy, medium or hard for this person based on what I'm seeing? Yep.

::

And so all of that's super important and alignment is really important for that

::

and details are really important, but just not for the reasons that we probably

::

used to think about muscle activation and posture and blah, blah, blah. That's it.

::

The purpose of form, I believe, is to guarantee the target muscle group is getting loaded.

::

That's why we're here. That's how you get stronger. You know what I mean?

::

So like if you're doing an exercise to work your abdominals,

::

you don't want to be loading your lower back.

::

You know, your form is dictating where the load is being directed.

::

Not that there's anything wrong with loading the lower back,

::

but if you're trying to load the abs, like let's load the abs.

::

And when we load the lower back, let's not load the abs, let's load the lower

::

back. That's right. That's right. So you're setting an intention and you're getting the outcome.

::

So the form is like the physical way to guide the load to that point, you know, so. um.

::

That's why it's so important that the form is right um but the understanding

::

of the instructors to be able to kind of always be aware of that that's that's

::

also important because like um.

::

Coming back to that point we made earlier about being really good at one thing

::

at a time and then expanding that.

::

A part of the process, for example, like if we're going to teach a lunge,

::

it'd be looking at, all right, you know, this name springs, props, body position, move.

::

Once you got them to the move part, which is the movement cue,

::

what we're looking at is how they're moving, like what positions are they're in.

::

And you're looking for things which are like high probability that aren't going to be working.

::

Like you've got the foot in the wrong position, the springs are wrong,

::

they've got their knee resting on the carriage when you didn't want that,

::

the coordination's off, you know, maybe they're going too deep into it,

::

turning into like a hip flexor stretch instead of loading up the front leg.

::

And obviously there's like so many different ways that people teach a lunge

::

and there's so many different beliefs about what you're trying to do with it.

::

So just to quantify mine, let's say we're doing body weight lunge so less tension is harder.

::

It kind of looks like a single leg deadlift. You're kind of hinging at the hips,

::

leaning forward, loading up the front leg. So your glutes on the standing leg are loaded.

::

And then as you stand up, carriage comes in. So you're targeting your butt on

::

the standing leg, basically.

::

And the carriage is there just

::

really to support the back leg and stop you falling over. That's right.

::

So if you were to put your knee on the carriage, then you're loading up the

::

hip flexor on the inside leg and you're taking the weight off the target muscle

::

group. So you're not going to get anything out of it.

::

So when you're training that new instructor. Well, you are going to.

::

It's got to be a nice, gentle hip flexor stretch.

::

Yeah. It's not what we wanted. No gentle stretching.

::

Yeah. So that, the measurable, basically the target muscle group's the reference

::

point of every exercise.

::

So if the experience you're meant to be getting is already dictated by what

::

the target muscle group is. So if you are getting a light hip flexor stretch

::

when you're going to be targeting the glutes, then obviously it's not the right

::

outcome. You know what I mean?

::

Not acceptable. Um, if you wanted to stretch the hip flexors,

::

obviously, yeah, go for it. Um, but the,

::

basically in every exercise there's like a probability of what will go wrong

::

because once you've seen it like 10 000 times you kind of get like a little

::

bit of a list of like oh no well,

::

this is probably going to happen so being able to let the instructors know exactly

::

what to look for kind of they can anticipate the things and so they find them

::

faster and then they teach them how to fix it in advance so then when it happens

::

they can just fix it straight away um so yeah obviously,

::

this stuff is exciting because you

::

can really accelerate the learning of an instructor and the confidence by

::

just letting them master one thing at a time rather than trying to overload them with so

::

much stuff i think like in getting into the lunge again and i'm i'm not sure

::

how much time we get so cut me off if we need to stop here but um like with

::

the lunge if your goal is to load the glutes which i think is a fine goal for

::

a lunge i would add and adductor magnus like the main adductor on the inside

::

of the front leg, the glute leg,

::

that's also going to work anytime you work those glutes in deep hip flexion,

::

like you're going to work your ductors as well.

::

And of course the quads, a little bit on the front leg, you're not going to

::

avoid working those, but yeah, all right, point taken. Um, yeah.

::

The things that are going to enhance that, you know, there's going to be like

::

a list of half a dozen things.

::

It's like, all right, well, you've got to have your weight on the front leg,

::

not the back leg. That's thing number one.

::

And if you hinge forwards more at the hip, you're going to go into more deep

::

hip flexion, which is going to load those hip extensor muscles or glutes and adductors more.

::

So if you hinge your torso forwards over the front leg, if you keep the knee

::

back behind the toes, it's going to load the hip more than the knee less.

::

Now, dear listener, there's no rule that says you can't lunge with your knee

::

forward of your toes in, like I'm all for lunding with your knee forward of your toes.

::

If you've got a reason for doing it, like you want to load the quads more or whatever, it's fine.

::

It's perfectly safe, perfectly healthy, nothing wrong with it.

::

But if you go also load the glutes, you're going to facilitate that more by

::

keeping your knee back and your shin more vertical and hinging at the hip more

::

rather than at the ankle and the knee more, because that's going to load the hip more.

::

And if you go also load the hip, well, let's load the hip. And then if you want

::

to take, once your body's hinged forward, you want to take your hands forwards

::

overhead, that's going to lengthen the lever.

::

Put more load on the hip. If you want to have a couple of two kilo dumbbells

::

in your hand, it's going to add even more to that.

::

Okay. So we can go more and more and more. And then at the other side of the

::

body, the more springs we have on the carriage there, the easier it is.

::

We're going to deload that front leg because this carriage now becomes a support.

::

The more we lean our knee or our foot or whatever on the back carriage, the easier it is.

::

So ultimately we would want to have our knee off the carriage,

::

zero or a very light spring on and a hundred or 99% of the weight on the front foot.

::

And in order to keep the spring as light as possible, whatever spring we've

::

got, we want to have the front foot, the grounded foot forward far enough so

::

that as you lunge down, the carriage doesn't get pushed out very far because

::

the further you push it out, the more attention's the spring.

::

And so all of these things, if we put them together, it's like, okay,

::

front foot is at the base of the foot bar a little bit in front your weights

::

all on the front leg shin is pretty vertical you're hinging forward at the hips

::

chest forwards arms reach above your head back knee off the carriage half a

::

spring or zero spring or a quarter spring,

::

No one in the world is not going to work their glutes if you do that.

::

That's it. You don't get a choice.

::

Now you may or may not feel it in the moment, but you're going to feel it tomorrow

::

morning when you wake up. Oh, if you stay there for three minutes, you'll feel it.

::

Yeah. Everyone hits the wall at some point. That burning sensation basically

::

is that fatigue sitting in.

::

And if you're feeling it in the target muscle group area, then you know you've done it right.

::

Yeah. And how do you know all that? How do I know all that? Well,

::

you have to have done fucking 10,000 lunges, right?

::

And gone, oh, when I lean forward, that hurts my glutes more.

::

You know, when I put my knee on the carriage, that hurts my glutes less,

::

you know, like yeah, you'd know that.

::

And then also just understanding some basic biomechanics about,

::

you know, what I said about loading the hip and loading the knee and all that kind of stuff.

::

And just thinking through the equipment settings, like you've,

::

you talk about all the time, like, okay, well in this, like you said,

::

there's a bodyweight lunge.

::

So less springs is harder. So therefore more springs is easier.

::

So therefore more tension on the springs is easier. so therefore I want to have

::

my foot further forwards to reduce the tension on the spring,

::

right and if I really wanted to do it I'd have no spring on or I'd keep my back

::

leg bent and I actually wouldn't push the carriage out as I I'll just just do

::

a squat with my foot resting on the carriage but I wouldn't push the carriage

::

out you know so yeah all of those basically just come from reps basically yeah that's right um so the.

::

The interesting thing about this is like, you know, you might,

::

if, if there was a comment section here, maybe there is a comment section somewhere

::

on Spotify, I haven't had a look at that yet.

::

Um, no doubt someone in comment section will say, oh, that's not a lunge.

::

Yeah. Well, in the method you learned it in, it's not called that,

::

but in the method that I've created or the method you've created,

::

we call it whatever we want to call it.

::

You know what I mean? And it's like, whoever does your method will learn your

::

exercise names and spring levels and systems for the purposes of achieving the

::

outcomes that were set by you or by the course.

::

So to, to argue about like something as trivial as what it's called,

::

it's really open to interpretation really.

::

Like it's called whatever it's want to be, what you want to call it.

::

And if you have a system behind it, then basically rather than kind of arguing

::

about what it should be called, it's irrelevant.

::

It's more about. What are you trying to achieve by it? Is it a hip flexor stretch?

::

Is it a quad workout? Is it a glute workout?

::

Like what's it for? Yeah. And if you don't know what it's for,

::

I can look at it and go, okay, I can tell whether it's doing that or not.

::

That's right. And therefore, you're achieving your objective.

::

Whether it's called a lunge or not, who gives a shit? That's right. Yeah.

::

That's it. That's just for the simplicity of like group understanding,

::

you know, how to have a name.

::

I mean, when you say lunge, I just think, okay, one foot's forward,

::

one foot's back and we're going up and down in some manner.

::

That's it. That's it. And whether your knees forwards are back,

::

your hips forwards are back, your toes are forwards are back,

::

your springs are high or low.

::

It's like, yeah, there's 50 different ways we could do that,

::

that would each achieve a slightly different outcome.

::

And I think what people by and large struggle with, what I used to struggle

::

with, what I see students struggling with at the early stages of that program

::

is they see the movement, but they don't really understand what it's for.

::

And I just think, okay, I'm doing a lunge, a lunge, a lunge,

::

a lunge, a lunge, a lunge.

::

Like, nah, depends on all of those things that we just listed out about positions

::

and springs and settings.

::

And you could totally change that lunge. Like if you put on two full springs

::

and put your knee on the carriage, it's like that becomes a completely different exercise.

::

You're not even working the front leg hardly at all. It's more about the back leg now.

::

And so, like, you can completely change the exercise by changing a couple of small exercises.

::

Things about the position or if you let them lean on their knee on the front

::

leg which is a common one that clients will try and do it's like or lean on

::

the foot bar whatever it's like yeah so it's,

::

and then you think oh we did a killer glute workout today it's like

::

yeah none not so much you know yeah like one of the worst things as an instructor

::

you could ever hear is i didn't really feel that and that's because the body

::

position wasn't right or something in the movement pattern wasn't right and

::

that's something or you didn't have the right load on for that person. That's right.

::

So that's something that you want to kind of eliminate hearing at all.

::

You always want to be able to kind of have your finger on the pulse and be like, okay, cool.

::

Because when you watch the speed of movement, range of motion,

::

you can tell by all those things, like what they're actually feeling to do it.

::

So you could make those changes. But you always want to get to a point where

::

you can guarantee every single person is getting the experience you intended.

::

So if you want them to feel the glutes on the front leg, that's what they've

::

got to get. And then you've got to make the changes until everyone gets it.

::

Um, yeah, one more thing I really want to cover with you is you had like a real viral post.

::

I must've been a couple of months back where you, you brought together like

::

all these different books and you're just kind of going through how the philosophy

::

and the people that are kind of creating the rules and the definitions of what

::

Pilates is and isn't changed over time.

::

And I couldn't believe how like systematic it was.

::

It was like, oh, this group kind of got into power and they decided that that's

::

not a part of it now. And every new group that came through was like,

::

oh, that's not right. You know?

::

So can you run us through really quickly, just like a short version of that?

::

Yeah, this is something I find fascinating.

::

It's basically, I call it Pilates through the ages, the history of Pilates.

::

And so Pilates was invented by a guy called Joseph Pilates.

::

And he didn't call it Pilates, he called it contrology, the art of control.

::

And he wrote a book in 1940, which he published in 1945, called Return to Life

::

Through Contrology, where he laid out 34 exercises all on the mat.

::

And so his system was very vigorous.

::

It was based on kind of early 20th century, late 19th century medical gymnastics.

::

Like, think about if you went into the army in 1920 and you did do like your

::

physical exercises, like imagine toe touches and star jumps and those types of things.

::

That type of thing. And so he never mentioned, like things that he never mentioned

::

at all that are like we take as for granted in place, like activating individual muscles.

::

Whole book in Return to Life with Contrology, you give very specific instructions

::

on how to do every single exercise, never once mentions a muscle, no muscles.

::

In fact, he specifically says in the book Pilates or Contrology is not merely

::

for the development of this or that pet set of muscles, but for the uniform

::

development of the body as a whole, right?

::

So he's against targeting, you know, this or that muscle. It's for the whole body development.

::

He doesn't mention neutral spine, not once. It's not a thing.

::

It doesn't have the concept, right?

::

Yeah, so he, in fact, specifically says when you're lying on your back,

::

you should press your low back flat to the mat, right? So we should flatten

::

our spine, which is not neutral. It's the opposite of neutral spinal flexion.

::

So then we get to the classical area. Joseph died in 1967, and sort of the next

::

person to kind of take up the mantle of the lead of Pilates was Romana Krasnowska, one of his students.

::

And there was many other of his students who were just as senior as Romana,

::

but for political reasons, she was kind of put in charge. She was kind of more...

::

Um, had a bigger personality, I think. Uh, so she was put in charge of,

::

of Pilates, uh, at Joe's old, um, studio and she was a prima ballerina with

::

the New York ballet, right?

::

And so this is where the classical era of Pilates came in, which was called

::

the classical because she was a classical dancer, right?

::

So she took all these things out of classical dance, like foot positions,

::

first position, second position, the, you know, the V, the wide foots on the

::

footwork positions that we have, they're all at a classical dance and this is a hug a tree.

::

This is just like first and second position in ballet, right?

::

So all of these, the rond de jambe and devil pay with the leg,

::

all the ballet terms that came from that era and she changed the system, you know,

::

fairly substantial, like added more exercises to it, changed the,

::

modified the technique for certain exercises, changed the cueing,

::

changed like quite substantial changes to the system. Um, yeah.

::

And made it much more balletic. So it was much less medical gymnastics and much more like dance now.

::

And then, uh, the people that Romana trained, you know, they became their instructors

::

in their own right in the like eighties and nineties and early two thousands.

::

And that was called the contemporary era of Pilates because they were contemporary

::

dancers, most of them. Right.

::

And so they introduced and they introduced stuff.

::

You know, that generation was like Moira Stott slash Merithew

::

and Rail Iskowitz with bassey and uh

::

brent anderson uh he wasn't a dancer he was a physiotherapist but

::

you know with with polestar and that kind of generation and

::

they introduced uh biomechanics and

::

principles and physiotherapy principles at

::

the time so that's where we introduced like in stop pilates i was never

::

taught oh actually the principles of pilates you know control centering

::

precision breath flowing movement blah blah blah that was introduced after

::

joseph died he never mentioned those in any of his books

::

right they were introduced in about 1980 so kind of in the classical era

::

um uh in a book by

::

friedman and eisen and then in the 1990s and

::

2000s in the contemporary era with with morris stott

::

and the and the polestar stuff they introduced instead

::

of the six principles of flow and precision and

::

blah blah blah they introduced biomechanical principles so

::

the principles that i learned in stott parties were pelvic placement breathing

::

thoracic and rib cage placement scapular stability and

::

mobility and cervical placement right so no mention of

::

precision or control or flowing movement or you know it was

::

all about the the scapula should sit flat and flush on the rib cage you know

::

blah blah blah so it was all about biomechanical principles and that's where

::

we introduced neutral spine and we went from flatten your spine fully on the

::

mat to neutral or a very slight imprint which is a like a baby flexion uh then

::

we went to activate your transversus abdominus.

::

A lot of those contemporary systems are big on that sort of deep muscle activation.

::

So we went from Joseph, never cue muscles.

::

Work inflection. We don't have any principles. Okay.

::

To like, now we've got these six principles to now work in neutral to cue muscles.

::

Like it's, it's literally opposite.

::

Wow. And the contemporary people introduced lots of partial moves.

::

So like, like the prep move for the hundred or the rollover, whatever it might be.

::

Uh, and then that became like in your first lesson with Joseph,

::

we used to have this video, we show our students first lesson with joseph like

::

never done pilates before he just some random person off the street completely untrained

::

you're doing the hundreds you're doing the roll over like these full-on moves and

::

joseph's like whacking on the head with a stick and telling you you know go

::

harder not literally whacking you with a stick but he was pretty forceful and

::

then you fast forward to like 2001 with stop pilates and it's like your first

::

lesson you barely get to move you literally just sit there you have to focus

::

on your breathing and expand your ribs this way and that way and you have to

::

focus on your pelvic flora and your transverse abdominal,

::

you never actually exert any muscular force at any point.

::

And so it's gone from this very vigorous exercise form from Joseph to this essentially.

::

The opposite of that, you know, very, very cerebral thinking about your muscles,

::

thinking about your alignment, thinking about your awareness of each muscle.

::

So mystical kind of. Yeah. And then now we're getting into this, um, fitness,

::

well, well into the thick of the fitness Pilates, you know, era where it's about

::

like what we've been talking about, targeting muscle groups and bringing people

::

near failure and improving strength and all of that.

::

And at each, and you know, so a lot of this fitness stuff, I mean,

::

a lot of people, are still doing neutral spine a lot of them aren't you know

::

so it's kind of a bit mixed bag some people are using dumbbells some people

::

think that's not real pilates you know so on and so forth some people on mega

::

formers some people think that's not real pilates and at each generation,

::

they look at the next generation and go the

::

kids these days you know back in my

::

day we had to walk to school 12 miles through the snow you know

::

bare feet it's like these these kids these days i don't understand

::

pilates you know back in my day you know we understood pilates because

::

we used to do neutral spines like yeah but the people when you

::

were a kid they were like oh these kids these days with their neutral spine like

::

oh for fuck's sake you know flatback was good enough for

::

us you know like what's wrong with these people you know what's the biomechanical

::

principles oh what's wrong with flowing control and precision and all of that

::

and joseph would have been like what's all these newfangled principles flowing

::

control and precision like you know why are you doing all this like isn't my

::

method good enough as i wrote it yeah and so every generation there's just like.

::

Resistance to the next generation i remember in like 2017 18 or something i

::

was in the pilates alliance of australasia on the board there and i remember

::

they had this brand new crazy franchise called kx pilates um which i'm not sure

::

if you've heard of them or not,

::

um at kx they had like some crazy number like 20 locations or something in australia

::

at the time you know it's pretty small and um the board and the pia were like

::

oh my goodness you know it's so dangerous like oh the group exercise is so badly

::

trained you know injuries blah blah it's not real pilates it's like.

::

Just fear it's just fear about the next new thing and now funnily enough i see on social media,

::

not specifically kx people but all of the people of

::

that generation who've been teaching group reform for a decade now like oh the

::

new instructors these days it's dangerous i don't know what they're doing it's

::

they're not trained properly it's the injuries and the people who are these

::

days who are trained in 10 years they're going to be saying exactly the same

::

freaking thing about whatever the next generation is it's like just get over

::

yourselves people like move with the times Yeah,

::

well, it just seems that people's kind of attention span is only limited to

::

like a decade or slightly before, but they might not realize that it's actually

::

changed so much from what it originally was.

::

But in saying that, as long as everyone is creating good experiences for their

::

clients, I think that's the main thing.

::

And the whole judgment thing is a bit like unnecessary.

::

I think there's a place for everybody. Teach contemporary, awesome, get a movie.

::

Like i said right at the start the biggest benefit goes

::

from doing nothing to doing a little bit even badly right so

::

you just get people moving if they enjoy doing classical

::

contemporary contrology fitness dumbbells mega format whatever

::

like like it's all good and if you want to

::

really maximize the benefit sure there is some biomechanics

::

and exercise science principles we can apply to maximize the

::

benefit but doing something is

::

just way better than doing nothing so

::

it's like we're all in this together and it's like

::

we should all just like be applauding each other

::

and sure we can help each other improve if we

::

want to get better at targeting the glutes is the best way

::

to do it right if you don't want to target the glutes fine you know if if your

::

clients come along and breathe and think about the pelvic floor for an hour

::

well it's way better than sitting on the couch drinking a glass of wine and

::

scrolling yeah so yeah it's all good it's all good thank you raf thank you so

::

much for coming in again mate yeah thank you,

::

Bye.

All Episodes Previous Episode

About the Podcast

Show artwork for Pilates Elephants
Pilates Elephants
No-BS, science-based tools to help you become a better, happier and more financially successful Pilates instructor

Listen for free

About your host

Profile picture for Raphael Bender

Raphael Bender