Episode 361

361. How important is exercise form for results?

Research paper cited in this episode: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11970409/

Mentioned in this episode:

Done-for-you client acquisition:



This podcast uses the following third-party services for analysis:

AdBarker - https://adbarker.com/privacy
Transcript
::

Welcome to Pilates Elephants. How important is it to have good technique in

::

order to achieve the full benefits of an exercise?

::

Well, that was the subject of a research study published in the International

::

Journal of Exercise Science in March 2025.

::

And I'm going to walk you through what they studied and what they found.

::

So this study, first of all,

::

was looking at muscle growth. So when they talked about effectiveness,

::

what they mean is how effective were the exercises for growing muscle?

::

So they weren't evaluating strength, they weren't evaluating range of motion,

::

they weren't evaluating other factors like functional ability, etc.

::

But this study was measuring muscle growth.

::

All right, so what they did was they had two groups of people between the age of 18 and 40.

::

There were women and men, and they were all healthy.

::

And it was within subject design. So what that means is they studied,

::

they did different interventions on the left arm versus the right arm within the same person.

::

And this is a very clever design because it eliminates differences that might

::

be due to different genetics or different nutrition or different recovery.

::

So when you have the left and right arm or left and right leg of a subject in

::

the same study doing different protocols,

::

any differences between the results of those arms can't be due to genetics or

::

nutrition or recovery because the same person owns both arms.

::

And plus this gives essentially double the number of, the double the statistical

::

power because we have 60 arms in 30 people.

::

Whereas if you just studied between people and one person did one protocol and

::

the other person did the other protocol, you'd only have 30 subjects.

::

So it's a very clever design for testing things like this study tested,

::

where we're looking at two different exercise interventions and trying to determine

::

if there's a difference in the effect of the exercise interventions.

::

And so what this study did was they got these people to do two exercises.

::

On each arm. So they did biceps curls and they did triceps pushdowns.

::

And a triceps pushdown is a cable machine

::

exercise where essentially it's a standing exercise and you start with your

::

elbow by your side and your hand is holding a cable like the handle on the end

::

of the cable and on the other end of the cable are some weight plates and you

::

keep your upper arm still and you just extend your elbow.

::

So it's a triceps extension with the upper arm staying tight to the body, to the upper body.

::

And biceps curls is the exact reverse of that.

::

You start with the arm by the side of the body, the upper arm remains vertical,

::

and then the lower arm, the forearm, flexes up towards the shoulder.

::

So there were two conditions. And so one arm did one condition and one arm did

::

the other condition, and the conditions were called strict and cheat.

::

And so one arm, the researchers instructed the participants to use strict form.

::

So they gave them very specific instructions to stand with hips,

::

with legs, feet hip distance apart, with spine neutral, with the upper arm.

::

Vertical, so zero degrees of flexion, zero degrees of abduction for both the

::

biceps curl and the triceps extension.

::

And they were instructed that the elbow joint was the only joint that should

::

move during the movement.

::

They were instructed to do a one second concentric.

::

So in the biceps curl, the lifting phase is the concentric.

::

And in the triceps push down, the pushing down phase is the concentric,

::

so they're instructed to take one second to complete the concentric phase,

::

and then two seconds to complete the eccentric phase, which is just the reverse.

::

So in the biceps curl, the eccentric phase is the lowering phase,

::

and in the triceps pushdown, the eccentric phase is the raising phase.

::

Whereas in the cheat condition, they were instructed to use,

::

external momentum, so to fling their hips forward and lean their torso back

::

in order to lift the biceps curl, and to lean their torso forwards and flare

::

their elbows out in order to do the triceps pushdown.

::

So to use, quote, bad, end quote, form.

::

Using external resistance and their body weight to complete the repetitions

::

as explosively as possible.

::

And they started out by measuring their 10 rep max, so the weight that they

::

could do 10 repetitions but not 11, with both the strict form and the cheat form.

::

So what happened was the cheat arm ended up having a much heavier weight because

::

you can lift a much heavier biceps curl weight when you cheat and shift your

::

hips forward and torso back and use momentum and swing the weight up,

::

compared to when you stay perfectly still in your spine and your hips and your

::

upper arm and you just flex the elbow, you can't biceps curl as heavy of a weight.

::

And the same holds true for triceps pushdown.

::

When you lean forwards and flare your elbows, you can actually push down a greater weight.

::

And so the researchers tested how much the participants could do 10 reps of

::

in both the strict condition and the cheat condition and so they gave them the

::

exact weight they could do 10 reps of or 8 to 12 actually was the number that they worked on.

::

Based on whether that arm was doing strict or cheat.

::

So the cheat arms always ended up having heavier loads than the strict arms,

::

but both arms got to failure, so where they couldn't complete another concentric

::

repetition within the range of 8 to 12 reps.

::

So the cheat arms were getting to 8 to 12 reps with a heavier weight because

::

they were swinging and using momentum and body weight, whereas the strict arms

::

got to the same level of exertion, momentary concentric failure,

::

within the same rep range, 8 to 12 reps, but just using a lighter weight and

::

zero momentum and using strict form.

::

And they did this workout. They did four sets of each exercise twice per week

::

on non-concentric days for eight weeks.

::

And at the end of the study, 25 people completed the study out of the 30,

::

and they measured muscle thickness at, I think,

::

four sites in each muscle, so in the biceps and triceps, by ultrasound.

::

And they did a bunch of statistical analysis, like a multivariate analysis and

::

a univariate analysis, to see whether there were any differences in the muscle

::

thickness between the two groups.

::

And what they found was there were no significant differences.

::

And they did multiple different statistical tests, and all of the tests showed

::

that there was no statistical difference between the groups,

::

and even there was hardly any numerical difference between the groups.

::

So when you look at the graphs of the muscle growth, both groups grew their

::

biceps and their triceps during the eight weeks, but the amount of growth was

::

almost identical, and in three out of the four sites,

::

there was a very slight greater growth or trend to greater growth in the cheat condition.

::

Now, that was not statistically significant. So, essentially,

::

for all intents and purposes, both groups achieved identical muscle growth.

::

So, why could this be? Why could wildly cheating and flinging a dumbbell up

::

into a biceps curl, using momentum from your hips and your spine, why could that.

::

Produce the same amount of growth or as a strict movement?

::

Well, the answer is because when they did, when the participants used the cheat,

::

they could actually lift more weight because they were using their hips and

::

their spine as well as their biceps.

::

So the researcher just gave them more weight. So they actually used a heavier weight.

::

And so even though the biceps was producing only part of the force and some

::

of the force to lift the dumbbell came from the hips and the spine,

::

it was a greater weight that they were lifting.

::

So even though the biceps was only lifting, let's say, you know,

::

60% of it, well, they were lifting a 40% heavier weight or whatever.

::

I don't know what the exact difference was, but they were lifting a substantially heavier weight.

::

So 60% was still enough to fatigue the biceps to momentary concentric failure

::

within this stated rep range.

::

So, even though the other muscles in the hips and spine contributed,

::

the biceps itself also reached momentary failure. So.

::

But the takeaway from this is not that cheating is better or strict form is

::

better for muscle growth. They're both identical.

::

But that cheating works just as well as long as you increase the load so that

::

you reach the same fatigue endpoint, the same intensity of endpoint. point.

::

So, you know, what is the practical takeaway of this for Pilates?

::

Does this mean that we should abandon all technique and, you know,

::

simply fling, you know, use momentum to fling through movements?

::

No, of course not. Because there are other goals for movement,

::

you know, growing muscle is one very important goal for movement.

::

And there are other goals And control, flexibility,

::

just the very act of becoming more skillful at the movement is inherently satisfying

::

and motivating to clients.

::

So absolutely, I think we should encourage people to do,

::

I'm going to use the word correct technique and being correct being defined as correct.

::

The Pilates move, you know, if you're teaching, for example,

::

Contrology, you know, follow the instructions by Joseph Pilates, for example.

::

I think it is important in Pilates, and that is one of the key defining features of Pilates,

::

is that it requires great concentration to move and to try to achieve correct form.

::

And from that great concentration follows where we're able to get into a flow state.

::

And that gives rise to many of the great benefits of Pilates around mental well-being

::

and reducing anxiety and depression and stuff and why we all feel so happy after doing Pilates.

::

And so I think absolutely technique is important for those reasons,

::

but it's not important, it turns out, for building muscle.

::

So if your goal is

::

purely to build strength in say a lunge or a push-up or something if somebody's

::

elbows are flaring out or their knee is flaring out or whatever it might be

::

that as long as they have enough load that they do reach a high enough level of intensity i.e.

::

Close proximity to momentary concentric failure where they can't complete another

::

concentric rep so getting within two or three reps of that point.

::

As long as they achieve that, then they are going to get.

::

Essentially identical benefits in terms of muscle growth.

::

And I would argue, we don't have direct evidence for this, but I would argue

::

pretty strongly based on my understanding of biomechanics and strength science, that they are very,

::

very likely to get identical or

::

possibly even greater benefits in terms of strength building by cheating.

::

So dear listener, I hope you found that at least thought-provoking,

::

I'm going to link to the study in the show notes.

::

The name of the study is Do Cheaters Prosper?

::

Effects of Externally Supplied Momentum During Resistance Training on Measures

::

of Upper Body Muscle Hypertrophy by Francesca Augustin et al.

::

And it was published in the International Journal of Exercise Science in March 2025.

::

So with that, dear listener, much love, and I will see you in the next one.

About the Podcast

Show artwork for Pilates Elephants
Pilates Elephants
No-BS, science-based tools to help you become a better, happier and more financially successful Pilates instructor

About your host

Profile picture for Raphael Bender

Raphael Bender