Episode 361
361. How important is exercise form for results?
Research paper cited in this episode: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11970409/
Mentioned in this episode:
Done-for-you client acquisition:
This podcast uses the following third-party services for analysis:
AdBarker - https://adbarker.com/privacy
Transcript
Welcome to Pilates Elephants. How important is it to have good technique in
::order to achieve the full benefits of an exercise?
::Well, that was the subject of a research study published in the International
::Journal of Exercise Science in March 2025.
::And I'm going to walk you through what they studied and what they found.
::So this study, first of all,
::was looking at muscle growth. So when they talked about effectiveness,
::what they mean is how effective were the exercises for growing muscle?
::So they weren't evaluating strength, they weren't evaluating range of motion,
::they weren't evaluating other factors like functional ability, etc.
::But this study was measuring muscle growth.
::All right, so what they did was they had two groups of people between the age of 18 and 40.
::There were women and men, and they were all healthy.
::And it was within subject design. So what that means is they studied,
::they did different interventions on the left arm versus the right arm within the same person.
::And this is a very clever design because it eliminates differences that might
::be due to different genetics or different nutrition or different recovery.
::So when you have the left and right arm or left and right leg of a subject in
::the same study doing different protocols,
::any differences between the results of those arms can't be due to genetics or
::nutrition or recovery because the same person owns both arms.
::And plus this gives essentially double the number of, the double the statistical
::power because we have 60 arms in 30 people.
::Whereas if you just studied between people and one person did one protocol and
::the other person did the other protocol, you'd only have 30 subjects.
::So it's a very clever design for testing things like this study tested,
::where we're looking at two different exercise interventions and trying to determine
::if there's a difference in the effect of the exercise interventions.
::And so what this study did was they got these people to do two exercises.
::On each arm. So they did biceps curls and they did triceps pushdowns.
::And a triceps pushdown is a cable machine
::exercise where essentially it's a standing exercise and you start with your
::elbow by your side and your hand is holding a cable like the handle on the end
::of the cable and on the other end of the cable are some weight plates and you
::keep your upper arm still and you just extend your elbow.
::So it's a triceps extension with the upper arm staying tight to the body, to the upper body.
::And biceps curls is the exact reverse of that.
::You start with the arm by the side of the body, the upper arm remains vertical,
::and then the lower arm, the forearm, flexes up towards the shoulder.
::So there were two conditions. And so one arm did one condition and one arm did
::the other condition, and the conditions were called strict and cheat.
::And so one arm, the researchers instructed the participants to use strict form.
::So they gave them very specific instructions to stand with hips,
::with legs, feet hip distance apart, with spine neutral, with the upper arm.
::Vertical, so zero degrees of flexion, zero degrees of abduction for both the
::biceps curl and the triceps extension.
::And they were instructed that the elbow joint was the only joint that should
::move during the movement.
::They were instructed to do a one second concentric.
::So in the biceps curl, the lifting phase is the concentric.
::And in the triceps push down, the pushing down phase is the concentric,
::so they're instructed to take one second to complete the concentric phase,
::and then two seconds to complete the eccentric phase, which is just the reverse.
::So in the biceps curl, the eccentric phase is the lowering phase,
::and in the triceps pushdown, the eccentric phase is the raising phase.
::Whereas in the cheat condition, they were instructed to use,
::external momentum, so to fling their hips forward and lean their torso back
::in order to lift the biceps curl, and to lean their torso forwards and flare
::their elbows out in order to do the triceps pushdown.
::So to use, quote, bad, end quote, form.
::Using external resistance and their body weight to complete the repetitions
::as explosively as possible.
::And they started out by measuring their 10 rep max, so the weight that they
::could do 10 repetitions but not 11, with both the strict form and the cheat form.
::So what happened was the cheat arm ended up having a much heavier weight because
::you can lift a much heavier biceps curl weight when you cheat and shift your
::hips forward and torso back and use momentum and swing the weight up,
::compared to when you stay perfectly still in your spine and your hips and your
::upper arm and you just flex the elbow, you can't biceps curl as heavy of a weight.
::And the same holds true for triceps pushdown.
::When you lean forwards and flare your elbows, you can actually push down a greater weight.
::And so the researchers tested how much the participants could do 10 reps of
::in both the strict condition and the cheat condition and so they gave them the
::exact weight they could do 10 reps of or 8 to 12 actually was the number that they worked on.
::Based on whether that arm was doing strict or cheat.
::So the cheat arms always ended up having heavier loads than the strict arms,
::but both arms got to failure, so where they couldn't complete another concentric
::repetition within the range of 8 to 12 reps.
::So the cheat arms were getting to 8 to 12 reps with a heavier weight because
::they were swinging and using momentum and body weight, whereas the strict arms
::got to the same level of exertion, momentary concentric failure,
::within the same rep range, 8 to 12 reps, but just using a lighter weight and
::zero momentum and using strict form.
::And they did this workout. They did four sets of each exercise twice per week
::on non-concentric days for eight weeks.
::And at the end of the study, 25 people completed the study out of the 30,
::and they measured muscle thickness at, I think,
::four sites in each muscle, so in the biceps and triceps, by ultrasound.
::And they did a bunch of statistical analysis, like a multivariate analysis and
::a univariate analysis, to see whether there were any differences in the muscle
::thickness between the two groups.
::And what they found was there were no significant differences.
::And they did multiple different statistical tests, and all of the tests showed
::that there was no statistical difference between the groups,
::and even there was hardly any numerical difference between the groups.
::So when you look at the graphs of the muscle growth, both groups grew their
::biceps and their triceps during the eight weeks, but the amount of growth was
::almost identical, and in three out of the four sites,
::there was a very slight greater growth or trend to greater growth in the cheat condition.
::Now, that was not statistically significant. So, essentially,
::for all intents and purposes, both groups achieved identical muscle growth.
::So, why could this be? Why could wildly cheating and flinging a dumbbell up
::into a biceps curl, using momentum from your hips and your spine, why could that.
::Produce the same amount of growth or as a strict movement?
::Well, the answer is because when they did, when the participants used the cheat,
::they could actually lift more weight because they were using their hips and
::their spine as well as their biceps.
::So the researcher just gave them more weight. So they actually used a heavier weight.
::And so even though the biceps was producing only part of the force and some
::of the force to lift the dumbbell came from the hips and the spine,
::it was a greater weight that they were lifting.
::So even though the biceps was only lifting, let's say, you know,
::60% of it, well, they were lifting a 40% heavier weight or whatever.
::I don't know what the exact difference was, but they were lifting a substantially heavier weight.
::So 60% was still enough to fatigue the biceps to momentary concentric failure
::within this stated rep range.
::So, even though the other muscles in the hips and spine contributed,
::the biceps itself also reached momentary failure. So.
::But the takeaway from this is not that cheating is better or strict form is
::better for muscle growth. They're both identical.
::But that cheating works just as well as long as you increase the load so that
::you reach the same fatigue endpoint, the same intensity of endpoint. point.
::So, you know, what is the practical takeaway of this for Pilates?
::Does this mean that we should abandon all technique and, you know,
::simply fling, you know, use momentum to fling through movements?
::No, of course not. Because there are other goals for movement,
::you know, growing muscle is one very important goal for movement.
::And there are other goals And control, flexibility,
::just the very act of becoming more skillful at the movement is inherently satisfying
::and motivating to clients.
::So absolutely, I think we should encourage people to do,
::I'm going to use the word correct technique and being correct being defined as correct.
::The Pilates move, you know, if you're teaching, for example,
::Contrology, you know, follow the instructions by Joseph Pilates, for example.
::I think it is important in Pilates, and that is one of the key defining features of Pilates,
::is that it requires great concentration to move and to try to achieve correct form.
::And from that great concentration follows where we're able to get into a flow state.
::And that gives rise to many of the great benefits of Pilates around mental well-being
::and reducing anxiety and depression and stuff and why we all feel so happy after doing Pilates.
::And so I think absolutely technique is important for those reasons,
::but it's not important, it turns out, for building muscle.
::So if your goal is
::purely to build strength in say a lunge or a push-up or something if somebody's
::elbows are flaring out or their knee is flaring out or whatever it might be
::that as long as they have enough load that they do reach a high enough level of intensity i.e.
::Close proximity to momentary concentric failure where they can't complete another
::concentric rep so getting within two or three reps of that point.
::As long as they achieve that, then they are going to get.
::Essentially identical benefits in terms of muscle growth.
::And I would argue, we don't have direct evidence for this, but I would argue
::pretty strongly based on my understanding of biomechanics and strength science, that they are very,
::very likely to get identical or
::possibly even greater benefits in terms of strength building by cheating.
::So dear listener, I hope you found that at least thought-provoking,
::I'm going to link to the study in the show notes.
::The name of the study is Do Cheaters Prosper?
::Effects of Externally Supplied Momentum During Resistance Training on Measures
::of Upper Body Muscle Hypertrophy by Francesca Augustin et al.
::And it was published in the International Journal of Exercise Science in March 2025.
::So with that, dear listener, much love, and I will see you in the next one.
